for some possess only kingly power regulated by law,
and rule those who voluntarily submit to their government;
others rule despotically according to their own will.
There is a third species of tyranny, most properly
so called, which is the very opposite to kingly power;
for this is the government of one who rules over his
equals and superiors without being accountable for
his conduct, and whose object is his own advantage,
and not the advantage of those he governs; for which
reason he rules by compulsion, for no freemen will
ever willingly submit to such a government.
These are the different species of tyrannies, their
principles, and their causes.
CHAPTER XI
We proceed now to inquire what form of government
and what manner of life is best for communities in
general, not adapting it to that superior virtue which
is above the reach of the vulgar, or that education
which every advantage of nature and fortune only can
furnish, nor to those imaginary plans which may be
formed at pleasure; but to that mode of life which
the greater part of mankind can attain to, and that
government which most cities may establish:
for as to those aristocracies which we have now mentioned,
they are either too perfect for a state to support,
or one so nearly alike to that state we now going
to inquire into, that we shall treat of them both as
one.
The opinions which we form upon these subjects must
depend upon one common principle: for if what
I have said in my treatise on Morals is true, a happy
life must arise from an uninterrupted course of virtue;
and if virtue consists in a certain medium, the middle
life must certainly be the happiest; which medium
is attainable [1295b] by every one. The boundaries
of virtue and vice in the state must also necessarily
be the same as in a private person; for the form of
government is the life of the city. In every city
the people are divided into three sorts; the very
rich, the very poor, and those who are between them.
If this is universally admitted, that the mean is
best, it is evident that even in point of fortune mediocrity
is to be preferred; for that state is most submissive
to reason; for those who are very handsome, or very
strong, or very noble, or very rich; or, on the contrary;
those who are very poor, or very weak, or very mean,
with difficulty obey it; for the one are capricious
and greatly flagitious, the other rascally and mean,
the crimes of each arising from their different excesses:
nor will they go through the different offices of
the state; which is detrimental to it: besides,
those who excel in strength, in riches, or friends,
or the like, neither know how nor are willing to submit
to command: and this begins at home when they
are boys; for there they are brought up too delicately
to be accustomed to obey their preceptors: as
for the very poor, their general and excessive want
of what the rich enjoy reduces them to a state too
mean: so that the one know not how to command,
but to be commanded as slaves, the others know not
how to submit to any command, nor to command themselves
but with despotic power.
Copyrights
Politics: A Treatise on Government from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.