BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature Guides Criticism/Essays Criticism/Essays Biographies Biographies My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

Jump to Page: / 195 

Search "Politics: A Treatise on Government"

Navigation

Politics: A Treatise on Government eBook

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
384 BC-322 BC Aristotle

Homer also discommends the government of many; but whether he means this we are speaking of, or where each person exercises his power separately, is uncertain.  When the people possess this power they desire to be altogether absolute, that they may not be under the control of the law, and this is the time when flatterers are held in repute.  Nor is there any difference between such a people and monarchs in a tyranny:  for their manners are the same, and they both hold a despotic power over better persons than themselves.  For their decrees are like the others’ edicts; their demagogues like the others’ flatterers:  but their greatest resemblance consists in the mutual support they give to each other, the flatterer to the tyrant, the demagogue to the people:  and to them it is owing that the supreme power is lodged in the votes of the people, and not in the laws; for they bring everything before them, as their influence is owing to their being supreme whose opinions they entirely direct; for these are they whom the multitude obey.  Besides, those who accuse the magistrates insist upon it, that the right of determining on their conduct lies in the people, who gladly receive their complaints as the means of destroying all their offices.

Any one, therefore, may with great justice blame such a government as being a democracy, and not a free state; for where the government is not in the laws, then there is no free state, for the law ought to be supreme over all things; and particular incidents which arise should be determined by the magistrates or the state.  If, therefore, a democracy is to be reckoned a free state, it is evident that any such establishment which centres all power in the votes of the people cannot, properly speaking, be a democracy:  for their decrees cannot be general in their extent.  Thus, then, we may describe the several species of democracies.

CHAPTER V

Of the different species of oligarchies one is, when the right to the offices is regulated by a certain census; so that the poor, although the majority, have no share in it; while all those who are included therein take part in the management of public affairs.  Another sort is, when [1292b] the magistrates are men of very small fortune, who upon any vacancy do themselves fill it up:  and if they do this out of the community at large, the state approaches to an aristocracy; if out of any particular class of people, it will be an oligarchy.  Another sort of oligarchy is, when the power is an hereditary nobility.  The fourth is, when the power is in the same hands as the other, but not under the control of law; and this sort of oligarchy exactly corresponds to a tyranny in monarchies, and to that particular species of democracies which I last mentioned in treating of that state:  this has the particular name of a dynasty.  These are the different sorts of oligarchies and democracies.

Copyrights
Politics: A Treatise on Government from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy