were reserved for the rich: and these afterwards
turned to tyrannies and these in their turn gave rise
to democracies; for the power of the tyrants continually
decreasing, on account of their rapacious avarice,
the people grew powerful enough to frame and establish
democracies: and as cities after that happened
to increase, probably it was not easy for them to
be under any other government than a democracy.
But if any person prefers a kingly government in a
state, what is to be done with the king’s children?
Is the family also to reign? But should they
have such children as some persons usually have, it
will be very detrimental. It may be said, that
then the king who has it in his power will never permit
such children to succeed to his kingdom. But
it is not easy to trust to that; for it is very hard
and requires greater virtue than is to be met with
in human nature. There is also a doubt concerning
the power with which a king should be entrusted:
whether he should be allowed force sufficient to compel
those who do not choose to be obedient to the laws,
and how he is to support his government? for if he
is to govern according to law and do nothing of his
own will which is contrary thereunto, at the same
time it will be necessary to protect that power with
which he guards the law, This matter however may not
be very difficult to determine; for he ought to have
a proper power, and such a one is that which will
be sufficient to make the king superior to any one
person or even a large part of the community, but
inferior to the whole, as the ancients always appointed
guards for that person whom they created aesumnetes
or tyrant; and some one advised the Syracusians, when
Dionysius asked for guards, to allow him such.
CHAPTER XVI
[1287a] We will next consider the absolute monarch
that we have just mentioned, who does everything according
to his own will: for a king governing under the
direction of laws which he is obliged to follow does
not of himself create any particular species of government,
as we have already said: for in every state whatsoever,
either aristocracy or democracy, it is easy to appoint
a general for life; and there are many who entrust
the administration of affairs to one person only;
such is the government at Dyrrachium, and nearly the
same at Opus. As for an absolute monarchy as
it is called, that is to say, when the whole state
is wholly subject to the will of one person, namely
the king, it seems to many that it is unnatural that
one man should have the entire rule over his fellow-citizens
when the state consists of equals: for nature
requires that the same right and the same rank should
necessarily take place amongst all those who are equal
by nature: for as it would be hurtful to the
body for those who are of different constitutions
to observe the same regimen, either of diet or clothing,
so is it with respect to the honours of the state as
hurtful, that those who are equal in merit should be
Copyrights
Politics: A Treatise on Government from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.