he gave unlimited scope to the exercise of an active
and fruitful imagination. In respect to composition,
he is likewise liable to censure. At one time
he wearies, and at another tantalises the reader,
with the prolixity or ambiguity of his preambles.
His prelusive sentiments are sometimes far-fetched,
and converge not with a natural declination into the
focus of epigram. In dispensing praise and censure,
he often seems to be governed more by prejudice or
policy, than by justice and truth; and he is more
constantly attentive to the production of wit, than
to the improvement of morality.
But while we remark the blemishes and imperfections
of this poet, we must acknowledge his extraordinary
merits. In composition he is, in general, elegant
and correct; and where the subject is capable of connection
with sentiment, his inventive ingenuity never fails
to extract from it the essence of delight and surprise.
His fancy is prolific of beautiful images, and his
(505) judgment expert in arranging them to the greatest
advantage. He bestows panegyric with inimitable
grace, and satirises with equal dexterity. In
a fund of Attic salt, he surpasses every other writer;
and though he seems to have at command all the varied
stores of gall, he is not destitute of candour.
With almost every kind of versification he appears
to be familiar; and notwithstanding a facility of
temper, too accommodating, perhaps, on many occasions,
to the licentiousness of the times, we may venture
from strong indications to pronounce, that, as a moralist,
his principles were virtuous. It is observed
of this author, by Pliny the Younger, that, though
his compositions might, perhaps, not obtain immortality,
he wrote as if they would. [Aeterna, quae scripsit,
non erunt fortasse: ille tamen scripsit tanquam
futura.] The character which Martial gives of his
epigrams, is just and comprehensive:
Sunt bona, sunt quaedam mediocria,
sunt mala plura,
Quae legis: hic aliter
non fit, Avite, liber.
Some are good, some indifferent,
and some again still worse;
Such, Avitus, you will find
is a common case with verse.
THE END OF THE TWELVE CAESARS
LIVES OF EMINENT GRAMMARIANS
(506)
I. The science of grammar [842] was in ancient times
far from being in vogue at Rome; indeed, it was of
little use in a rude state of society, when the people
were engaged in constant wars, and had not much time
to bestow on the cultivation of the liberal arts [843].
At the outset, its pretensions were very slender,
for the earliest men of learning, who were both poets
and orators, may be considered as half-Greek:
I speak of Livius [844] and Ennius [845], who are
acknowledged to have taught both languages as well
at Rome as in foreign parts [846]. But they (507)
only translated from the Greek, and if they composed
anything of their own in Latin, it was only from what
they had before read. For although there are
those who say that this Ennius published two books,
one on “Letters and Syllables,” and the
other on “Metres,” Lucius Cotta has satisfactorily
proved that they are not the works of the poet Ennius,
but of another writer of the same name, to whom also
the treatise on the “Rules of Augury”
is attributed.
Copyrights
The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Complete from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.