The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 129 pages of information about The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet.

The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 129 pages of information about The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet.
and unmistakeable caricature of some eminent living person of whom he has never heard.  Yet if he produces the play he is legally responsible just as if he had written it himself.  Without protection he may find himself in the dock answering a charge of blasphemous libel, seditious libel, obscene libel, or all three together, not to mention the possibility of a private action for defamatory libel.  His sole refuge is the opinion of the Examiner of Plays, his sole protection the licence of the Lord Chamberlain.  A refusal to license does not hurt him, because he can produce another play:  it is the author who suffers.  The granting of the licence practically places him above the law; for though it may be legally possible to prosecute a licensed play, nobody ever dreams of doing it.  The really responsible person, the Lord Chamberlain, could not be put into the dock; and the manager could not decently be convicted when he could procure in his defence a certificate from the chief officer of the King’s household that the play was a proper one.

A TWO GUINEA INSURANCE POLICY

The censorship, then, provides the manager, at the negligible premium of two guineas per play, with an effective insurance against the author getting him into trouble, and a complete relief from all conscientious responsibility for the character of the entertainment at his theatre.  Under such circumstances, managers would be more than human if they did not regard the censorship as their most valuable privilege.  This is the simple explanation of the rally of the managers and their Associations to the defence of the censorship, of their reiterated resolutions of confidence in the Lord Chamberlain, of their presentations of plate, and, generally, of their enthusiastic contentment with the present system, all in such startling contrast to the denunciations of the censorship by the authors.  It also explains why the managerial witnesses who had least to fear from the Censor were the most reluctant in his defence, whilst those whose practice it is to strain his indulgence to the utmost were almost rapturous in his praise.  There would be absolute unanimity among the managers in favor of the censorship if they were all simply tradesmen.  Even those actor-managers who made no secret before the Committee of their contempt for the present operation of the censorship, and their indignation at being handed over to a domestic official as casual servants of a specially disorderly kind, demanded, not the abolition of the institution, but such a reform as might make it consistent with their dignity and unobstructive to their higher artistic aims.  Feeling no personal need for protection against the author, they perhaps forgot the plight of many a manager to whom the modern advanced drama is so much Greek; but they did feel very strongly the need of being protected against Vigilance Societies and Municipalities and common informers in a country where a large section of the community still believes that art of all kinds is inherently sinful.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.