The Power of Movement in Plants eBook

Francis Darwin
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 654 pages of information about The Power of Movement in Plants.

The Power of Movement in Plants eBook

Francis Darwin
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 654 pages of information about The Power of Movement in Plants.

Mimosa pudica and albida.—­The blades of several cotyledons of both these plants were rubbed or slightly scratched with a needle during 1 m. or 2 m.; but they did not move in the least.  When, however, the pulvini of six cotyledons of M. pudica were thus scratched, two of them were slightly raised.  In these two cases perhaps the pulvinus was accidentally pricked, for on pricking the pulvinus of another cotyledon it rose a little.  It thus appears that the cotyledons of Mimosa are less sensitive than those of the previously mentioned plants.*

Oxalis sensitiva.—­The blades and pulvini of two cotyledons, standing horizontally, were rubbed or rather tickled for 30 s. with a fine split bristle, and in 10 m. each had risen 48o; when looked at again in 35 m. after being rubbed they had risen 4o more; after 30 additional minutes they were again horizontal.  On hitting a pot rapidly with a stick for 1 m., the cotyledons of two seedlings were considerably raised in the course of 11 m.  A pot was carried a little distance on a tray and thus jolted; and the cotyledons of four seedlings were all raised in 10 m.; after 17 m. one had risen 56o, a second 45o, a third almost 90o, and a fourth 90o.  After an additional interval of 40 m. three of them had re-expanded to a considerable extent.  These observations were made before we were aware at what an extraordinarily rapid rate the cotyledons circumnutate, and are therefore liable to error.  Nevertheless it is extremely improbable that the cotyledons in the eight cases given, should all have been rising at the time when they were irritated.  The cotyledons of Oxalis Valdiviana and rosea were rubbed and did not exhibit any sensitiveness.]

Finally, there seems to exist some relation between

* The sole notice which we have met with on the sensitiveness of cotyledons, relates to Mimosa; for Aug.  P. De Candolle says (’Phys.  Vég.,’ 1832, tom. ii. p. 865), “les cotyledons du M. pudica tendent à se raprocher par leurs faces supérieures lorsqu’on les irrite.” [page 128]

the habit of cotyledons rising vertically at night or going to sleep, and their sensitiveness, especially that of their pulvini, to a touch; for all the above-named plants sleep at night.  On the other hand, there are many plants the cotyledons of which sleep, and are not in the least sensitive.  As the cotyledons of several species of Cassia are easily affected both by slightly diminished light and by contact, we thought that these two kinds of sensitiveness might be connected; but this is not necessarily the case, for the cotyledons of Oxalis sensitiva did not rise when kept on one occasion for 1 ½ h., and on a second occasion for nearly 4 h., in a dark closet.  Some other cotyledons, as those of Githago segetum, are much affected by a feeble light, but do not move when scratched by a needle.  That with the same plant there is some relation between the sensitiveness of its cotyledons and leaves seems highly probable, for the above described

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The Power of Movement in Plants from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.