Neither the President nor myself alluded to the late lamented oversight on his part, and on meeting the members of the Supreme Court I did not find that by the omission to appoint me on said Court the members thereof felt that a great national loss had been suffered.  No one, in fact, throughout the evening alluded to this miscarriage of wisdom. ...

...  Much solicitude was expressed by many of those present regarding your health.  I told them in my off-hand manner that I was enjoying your absence greatly. ...

Having now had this most enjoyable talk with you, I shall delight myself with an hour’s discussion of oil leases upon the Osage Reservation with one Cato Sells.

Believe me, my dear madam, your most respectful obedient, humble, meek, modest, mild, loyal, loving, and disconsolate servant,

FRANKLIN K. LANE

TO WILL IRWIN

Washington, February 11, 1916

Dear will,—­So you are off for the happiest voyage you have ever made, with the girl of your heart, to see the whole world being changed and a new world made.  What a joy!  Don’t put off returning too long.  Remember that books must be timely now, and after you have a gizzard full of good chapter headings, come back and grind.

Nancy entirely approves of your wife and her books.  As always yours,

FRANKLIN K. LANE

TO—­

Washington, February 29, 1916

...  It is none of my business, but I have just seen an article coming out over your name respecting Pinchot, the wisdom of which I doubt.  I have never found any good to come by blurring an issue by personal contest or antagonisms.  You asked me when you left if you might not come in once in a while and talk with me, and I am taking the liberty in this way of dropping in on you, for I am deeply interested in water power development and want to see something result this Session.

I have no time to waste in fighting people, and I have found that by pursuing this policy I can promote measures that I favor.  To fight for a thing, the best way is to show its advantages and the need for it, and ignore those who do not take the same view, because there is an umpire in Congress that must balance the two positions, and therefore I can rely upon the strength of my position as against the weakness of the other man’s position.  If those who are in favor of water power development get to fighting each other, nothing will result.

I am giving you the benefit of this attitude of mine for your own guidance.  It may be entirely contrary to the policy that you, or your people, wish to pursue and my only solicitude is that the things I am for, should not be held back any longer by personal disputes.  Cordially yours,

FRANKLIN K. LANE