Bibliographical.

    I. The bookcase at home
    II.  Goldsmith
    III.  Cervantes
    IV.  Irving
    V. First fiction and drama
    VI.  Longfellow’s “Spanish student”
    VII.  Scott
    VIII.  Lighter fancies
    IX.  Pope
    X. Various preferences
    XI.  Uncle tom’s cabin
    XII.  Ossian
    XIII.  Shakespeare
    XIV.  Ik Marvel
    XV.  Dickens
    XVI.  Wordsworth, Lowell, Chaucer
    XVII.  Macaulay. 
    XVIII.  Critics and reviews. 
    XIX.  A non-literary episode
    XX.  Thackeray
    XXI.  “Lazarillo de Tormes”
    XXII.  Curtis, Longfellow, Schlegel
    XXIII.  Tennyson
    XXIV.  Heine
    XXV.  De Quincey, Goethe, Longfellow. 
    XXVI.  George Eliot, Hawthorne, Goethe, Heine
    XXVII.  Charles Reade
    XXVIII.  Dante. 
    XXIX.  Goldoni, manzoni, D’AZEGLIO
    XXX.  “Pastor Fido,” “Aminta,” “Romola,” “Yeast,” “Paul Ferroll”
    XXXI.  Erckmann-Chatrian, Bjorstjerne Bjornson
    XXXII.  Tourguenief, Auerbach
    XXXIII.  Certain preferences and experiences
    XXXIV.  Valdes, Galdos, Verga, Zola, Trollope, hardy
    XXXV.  Tolstoy

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL

The papers collected here under the name of ‘My Literary Passions’ were printed serially in a periodical of such vast circulation that they might well have been supposed to have found there all the acceptance that could be reasonably hoped for them.  Nevertheless, they were reissued in a volume the year after they first appeared, in 1895, and they had a pleasing share of such favor as their author’s books have enjoyed.  But it is to be doubted whether any one liked reading them so much as he liked writing them—­say, some time in the years 1893 and 1894, in a New York flat, where he could look from his lofty windows over two miles and a half of woodland in Central Park, and halloo his fancy wherever he chose in that faery realm of books which he re-entered in reminiscences perhaps too fond at times, and perhaps always too eager for the reader’s following.  The name was thought by the friendly editor of the popular publication where they were serialized a main part of such inspiration as they might be conjectured to have, and was, as seldom happens with editor and author, cordially agreed upon before they were begun.