That disappearance accounts for much in her miscellaneous
writings. As I was saying, she handles her “ancestral
shadows,” as she calls them, just as I do mine.
It is remarkable. When she runs across “a
relative of my Grandfather Baker, General Henry Knox,
of Revolutionary fame,” she sets him down; when
she finds another good one, “the late Sir John
Macneill, in the line of my Grandfather Baker’s
family,” she sets him down, and remembers that
he “was prominent in British politics, and at
one time held the position of ambassador to Persia”;
when she discovers that her grandparents “were
likewise connected with Captain John Lovewell, whose
gallant leadership and death in the Indian troubles
of 1722-25 caused that prolonged contest to be known
historically as Lovewell’s War,” she sets
the Captain down; when it turns out that a cousin of
her grandmother “was John Macneill, the New
Hampshire general, who fought at Lundy’s Lane
and won distinction in 1814 at the battle of Chippewa,”
she catalogues the General. (And tells where Chippewa
was.) And then she skips all her platform people;
never mentions one of them. It shows that she
is just as human as any of us.
Yet, after all, there is something very touching in
her pride in these worthy small-fry, and something
large and fine in her modesty in not caring to remember
that their kinship to her can confer no distinction
upon her, whereas her mere mention of their names has
conferred upon them a faceless earthly immortality.
CHAPTER II
When she wrote this little biography her great life-work
had already been achieved, she was become renowned;
to multitudes of reverent disciples she was a sacred
personage, a familiar of God, and His inspired channel
of communication with the human race. Also, to
them these following things were facts, and not doubted:
She had written a Bible in middle age, and had published
it; she had recast it, enlarged it, and published
it again; she had not stopped there, but had enlarged
it further, polished its phrasing, improved its form,
and published it yet again. It was at last become
a compact, grammatical, dignified, and workman-like
body of literature. This was good training,
persistent training; and in all arts it is training
that brings the art to perfection. We are now
confronted with one of the most teasing and baffling
riddles of Mrs. Eddy’s history—a riddle
which may be formulated thus:
How is it that a primitive literary gun which began
as a hundred-yard flint-lock smooth-bore muzzle-loader,
and in the course of forty years has acquired one
notable improvement after another—percussion
cap; fixed cartridge; rifled barrel; efficiency at
half a mile how is it that such a gun, sufficiently
good on an elephant hunt (Christian Science) from the
beginning, and growing better and better all the time
during forty years, has always collapsed back to its
original flint-lock estate the moment the huntress
trained it on any other creature than an elephant?
Copyrights
Christian Science from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.