Massachusetts is a sovereign and independent State; and it is no privilege of mine to scold her for what she does.  Still, if from what she has done an inference is sought to be drawn as to what I would do, I may without impropriety speak out.  I say, then, that, as I understand the Massachusetts provision, I am against its adoption in Illinois, or in any other place where I have a right to oppose it.  Understanding the spirit of our institutions to aim at the elevation of men, I am opposed to whatever tends to degrade them.  I have some little notoriety for commiserating the oppressed negro; and I should be strangely inconsistent if I could favor any project for curtailing the existing rights of white men, even though born in different lands, and speaking different languages from myself.  As to the matter of fusion, I am for it if it can be had on Republican grounds; and I am not for it on any other terms.  A fusion on any other terms would be as foolish as unprincipled.  It would lose the whole North, while the common enemy would still carry the whole South.  The question of men is a different one.  There are good, patriotic men and able statesmen in the South whom I would cheerfully support, if they would now place themselves on Republican ground, but I am against letting down the Republican standard a hairsbreadth.

I have written this hastily, but I believe it answers your questions substantially.

Yours truly,

A. Lincoln.

TO THE GOVERNOR, AUDITOR, AND TREASURER OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

Gentlemen: 

In reply to your inquiry; requesting our written opinion as to what your duty requires you to do in executing the latter clause of the Seventh Section of “An Act in relation to the payment of the principal and interest of the State debt,” approved Feb’y 22, 1859, we reply that said last clause of said section is certainly indefinite, general, and ambiguous in its description of the bonds to be issued by you; giving no time at which the bonds are to be made payable, no place at which either principal or interest are to be paid, and no rate of interest which the bonds are to bear; nor any other description except that they are to be coupon bonds, which in commercial usage means interest-paying bonds with obligations or orders attached to them for the payment of annual or semiannual interest; there is we suppose no difficulty in ascertaining, if this act stood alone, what ought to be the construction of the terms “coupon bonds” and that it, would mean bonds bearing interest from the time of issuing the same.  And under this act considered by itself the creditors would have a right to require such bonds.  But your inquiry in regard to a class of bonds on which no interest is to be paid or shall begin to run until January 1, 1860, is whether the Act of February 18, 1857, would not authorize you to refuse to give bonds with any coupons attached