He has enriched our world with conquests of romance;
he has recut and reset a thousand ancient gems of
Greece and Rome; he has roused our patriotism; he
has stirred our pity; there is hardly a human passion
but he has purged it and ennobled it, including “this
of love.” Truly, the Laureate remains
the most various, the sweetest, the most exquisite,
the most learned, the most Virgilian of all English
poets, and we may pity the lovers of poetry who died
before Tennyson came.
Here may end the desultory tale of a desultory bookish
boyhood. It was not in nature that one should
not begin to rhyme for one’s self. But
those exercises were seldom even written down; they
lived a little while in a memory which has lost them
long ago. I do remember me that I tried some
of my attempts on my dear mother, who said much what
Dryden said to “Cousin Swift,” “You
will never be a poet,” a decision in which I
straightway acquiesced. For to rhyme is one thing,
to be a poet quite another. A good deal of mortification
would be avoided if young men and maidens only kept
this obvious fact well posed in front of their vanity
and their ambition.
In these bookish memories I have said nothing about
religion and religious books, for various reasons.
But, unlike other Scots of the pen, I got no harm
from “The Shorter Catechism,” of which
I remember little, and neither then nor now was or
am able to understand a single sentence. Some
precocious metaphysicians comprehended and stood aghast
at justification, sanctification, adoption, and effectual
calling. These, apparently, were necessary processes
in the Scottish spiritual life. But we were
not told what they meant, nor were we distressed by
a sense that we had not passed through them.
From most children, one trusts, Calvinism ran like
water off a duck’s back; unlucky were they who
first absorbed, and later were compelled to get rid
of, “The Shorter Catechism!”
One good thing, if no more, these memories may accomplish.
Young men, especially in America, write to me and
ask me to recommend “a course of reading.”
Distrust a course of reading! People who really
care for books read all of them. There
is no other course. Let this be a reply.
No other answer shall they get from me, the inquiring
young men.
II
People talk, in novels, about the delights of a first
love. One may venture to doubt whether everybody
exactly knows which was his, or her, first love, of
men or women, but about our first loves in books there
can be no mistake. They were, and remain, the
dearest of all; after boyhood the bloom is off the
literary rye. The first parcel of these garrulities
ended when the author left school, at about the age
of seventeen. One’s literary equipment
seems to have been then almost as complete as it ever
will be, one’s tastes definitely formed, one’s
favourites already chosen. As long as we live
Copyrights
Adventures Among Books from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.