But you have not and never had the right to think as you please, inside or outside the Church.  This means the right to form false judgments, to draw conclusions contrary to fact.  This is not a right, it is a defect, a disease.  Thus to act is not the normal function of the brain.  It is no more the nature of the mind to generate falsehoods than it is the nature of a sewing machine to cut hair.  Both were made for different things.  He therefore who disobeys the law that governs his mind prostitutes that faculty to error.

But suppose, being a Catholic, I cannot see things in that true light, what then?  In such a case, either you persist, in the matter of your faith, in being guided by the smoky lamp of your reason alone, or you will be guided by the authority of God’s appointed Church.  In the first alternative, your place is not in the Church, for you exclude yourself by not living up to the conditions of her membership.  You cannot deny but that she has the right to determine those conditions.

If you choose the latter, then correct yourself.  It is human to err, but it is stupidity to persist in error and refuse to be enlightened.  If you cannot see for yourself, common sense demands that you get another to see for you.  You are not supposed to know the alpha and omega of theological science, but you are bound to possess a satisfactory knowledge in order that your faith be reasonable.

Has no one a right to differ from the Church?  Yes, those who err unconsciously, who can do so conscientiously, that is, those who have no suspicion of their being in error.  These the heavenly Father will look after and bring safe to Himself, for their error is material and not formal.  He loves them but He hates their errors.  So does the Church abominate the false doctrines that prevail in the world outside her fold, yet at the same time she has naught but compassion and pity and prayers for those deluded ones who spread and receive those errors.  To her the individual is sacred, but the heresy is damnable.

Thus we may mingle with our fellow citizens in business and in pleasure, socially and politically, but religiously—­never.  Our charity we can offer in its fullest measure, but charity that lends itself to error, loses its sacred character and becomes the handmaid of evil, for error is evil.

CHAPTER XXIII.  THE CONSISTENT BELIEVER.

The intolerance of the Church towards error, the natural position of One who is the custodian of truth, her only reasonable attitude, makes her forbid her children to read, or listen to, heretical controversy, or to endeavor to discover religious truth by examining both sides of the question.  This places the Catholic in a position whereby he must stand aloof from all manner of doctrinal teaching other than that delivered by his Church through her accredited ministers.  And whatever outsiders may think of the correctness of his belief and religious principles, they cannot have two opinions as to the logic and consistency of this stand he takes.  They may hurl at him all the choice epithets they choose for being a slave to superstition and erroneous creeds; but they must give him credit for being consistent in his belief; and consistency in religious matters is too rare a commodity these days to be made light of.