a sounder historian than Taney; but an amazing fact
is to be added: the Constitution, whose authors,
according to Taney, could not conceive of a negro
as a citizen, was actually the act of a number of
States in several of which negroes were exercising
the full rights of citizens at the time. It
would be easy to bring almost equally plain considerations
to bear against the more elaborate argument of Taney
that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional,
but it is enough to say this much: the first
four Presidents—that is, all the Presidents
who were in public life when the Constitution was made—had
all acted unhesitatingly upon the belief that Congress
had the power to allow or forbid slavery in the Territories.
The fifth, John Quincy Adams, when he set his hand
to Acts involving this principle, had consulted before
doing so the whole of his Cabinet on this constitutional
point and had signed such legislation with the full
concurrence of them all. Even Polk had acted
later upon the same view. The Dred Scott judgment
would thus appear to show the penetrating power at
that time of an altogether fantastic opinion.
The hope, which Taney is known to have entertained,
that his judgment would compose excited public opinion,
was by no means fulfilled. It raised fierce
excitement. What practical effect would hereafter
be given to the opinion of six out of the nine judges
in that Court might depend on many things. But
to the Republicans, who appealed much to antiquity,
it was maddening to be thus assured that their whole
“platform” was unconstitutional.
In the long run, there seems to be no doubt that Taney
helped the cause of freedom. He had tried to
make evident the personal sense of compassion for
“these unfortunate people” with which
he contemplated the opinion that he ascribed to a past
generation; but he failed to do this, and instead he
succeeded in imparting to the supposed Constitutional
view of the slave, as nothing but a chattel, a horror
which went home to many thousands of the warm-hearted
men and women of his country.
For the time, however, the Republicans were deeply
depressed, and a further perplexity shortly befell
them. An attempt, to which we must shortly return,
was made to impose the slave system on Kansas against
the now unmistakable will of the majority there.
Against this attempt Douglas, in opposition to whom
the Republican party had been formed, revolted to
his lasting honour, and he now stood out for the occasion
as the champion of freedom. It was at this late
period of bewilderment and confusion that the life-story
of Abraham Lincoln became one with the life-story
of the American people.
CHAPTER V
THE RISE OF LINCOLN
1. Lincoln’s Return to Public Life.
We possess a single familiar letter in which Lincoln
opened his heart about politics. It was written
while old political ties were not yet quite broken
and new ties not quite knit, and it was written to
an old and a dear friend who was not his political
associate. We may fittingly place it here, as
a record of the strong and conflicting feelings out
of which his consistent purpose in this crisis was
formed.
Copyrights
Abraham Lincoln from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.