Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 1,748 pages of information about Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae).

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 1,748 pages of information about Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae).

On the contrary, The Apostle says (1 Cor. 9:17):  “A dispensation is committed to me.”

I answer that, Dispensation, properly speaking, denotes a measuring out to individuals of some common goods:  thus the head of a household is called a dispenser, because to each member of the household he distributes work and necessaries of life in due weight and measure.  Accordingly in every community a man is said to dispense, from the very fact that he directs how some general precept is to be fulfilled by each individual.  Now it happens at times that a precept, which is conducive to the common weal as a general rule, is not good for a particular individual, or in some particular case, either because it would hinder some greater good, or because it would be the occasion of some evil, as explained above (Q. 96, A. 6).  But it would be dangerous to leave this to the discretion of each individual, except perhaps by reason of an evident and sudden emergency, as stated above (Q. 96, A. 6).  Consequently he who is placed over a community is empowered to dispense in a human law that rests upon his authority, so that, when the law fails in its application to persons or circumstances, he may allow the precept of the law not to be observed.  If however he grant this permission without any such reason, and of his mere will, he will be an unfaithful or an imprudent dispenser:  unfaithful, if he has not the common good in view; imprudent, if he ignores the reasons for granting dispensations.  Hence Our Lord says (Luke 12:42):  “Who, thinkest thou, is the faithful and wise dispenser [Douay:  steward], whom his lord setteth over his family?”

Reply Obj. 1:  When a person is dispensed from observing the general law, this should not be done to the prejudice of, but with the intention of benefiting, the common good.

Reply Obj. 2:  It is not respect of persons if unequal measures are served out to those who are themselves unequal.  Wherefore when the condition of any person requires that he should reasonably receive special treatment, it is not respect of persons if he be the object of special favor.

Reply Obj. 3:  Natural law, so far as it contains general precepts, which never fail, does not allow of dispensations.  In other precepts, however, which are as conclusions of the general precepts, man sometimes grants a dispensation:  for instance, that a loan should not be paid back to the betrayer of his country, or something similar.  But to the Divine law each man stands as a private person to the public law to which he is subject.  Wherefore just as none can dispense from public human law, except the man from whom the law derives its authority, or his delegate; so, in the precepts of the Divine law, which are from God, none can dispense but God, or the man to whom He may give special power for that purpose. ________________________

QUESTION 98

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.