In America, likewise, some troublesome questions arose in connection with freedom of the press.  The Puritans of Massachusetts were no less anxious than King Charles or the Archbishop of London to shut out from the prying eyes of the people all literature “not mete for them to read”; and so they established a system of official licensing for presses, which lasted until 1755.  In the other colonies where there was more diversity of opinion and publishers could set up in business with impunity, they were nevertheless constantly liable to arrest for printing anything displeasing to the colonial governments.  In 1721 the editor of the Mercury in Philadelphia was called before the proprietary council and ordered to apologize for a political article, and for a later offense of a similar character he was thrown into jail.  A still more famous case was that of Peter Zenger, a New York publisher, who was arrested in 1735 for criticising the administration.  Lawyers who ventured to defend the unlucky editor were deprived of their licenses to practice, and it became necessary to bring an attorney all the way from Philadelphia.  By this time the tension of feeling was high, and the approbation of the public was forthcoming when the lawyer for the defense exclaimed to the jury that the very cause of liberty itself, not that of the poor printer, was on trial!  The verdict for Zenger, when it finally came, was the signal for an outburst of popular rejoicing.  Already the people of King George’s province knew how precious a thing is the freedom of the press.

Thanks to the schools, few and scattered as they were, and to the vigilance of parents, a very large portion, perhaps nearly one-half, of the colonists could read.  Through the newspapers, pamphlets, and almanacs that streamed from the types, the people could follow the course of public events and grasp the significance of political arguments.  An American opinion was in the process of making—­an independent opinion nourished by the press and enriched by discussions around the fireside and at the taverns.  When the day of resistance to British rule came, government by opinion was at hand.  For every person who could hear the voice of Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams, there were a thousand who could see their appeals on the printed page.  Men who had spelled out their letters while poring over Franklin’s Poor Richard’s Almanac lived to read Thomas Paine’s thrilling call to arms.

THE EVOLUTION IN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS

Two very distinct lines of development appeared in colonial politics.  The one, exalting royal rights and aristocratic privileges, was the drift toward provincial government through royal officers appointed in England.  The other, leading toward democracy and self-government, was the growth in the power of the popular legislative assembly.  Each movement gave impetus to the other, with increasing force during the passing years, until at last the final collision between the two ideals of government came in the war of independence.