FOOTNOTES: 

[Footnote 329:  Also spelt Campa and Tchampa.  It seems safer to use Ch for C in names which though of Indian origin are used outside India.  The final a though strictly speaking long is usually written without an accent.  The following are the principal works which I have consulted about Champa.

(a) G. Maspero, Le Royaume de Champa.  Published in T’oung Pao, 1910-1912.  Cited as Maspero.

(b) A. Bergaigne, “Inscriptions Sanskrites de Champa” in Notices et Extraits des Manuscrits de la Bibliotheque Nationale, tome XXVII. 1^re partie. 2^e fascicule, 1893, pp. 181-292.  Cited as Corpus, II.

(c) H. Parmentier, Inventaire descriptif des Monuments Cams de l’Annam. 1899.

(d) L. Finot, “La Religion des Chams,” B.E.F.E.O, 1901, and Notes d’Epigraphie.  “Les Inscriptions de Mi-son,” ib. 1904.  Numerous other papers by this author, Durand, Parmentier and others in the same periodical can be consulted with advantage.

(e) Id., Notes d’Epigraphie Indo-Chinoise, 1916.]

[Footnote 330:  Corpus, II. p. 11, and Finot, Notes d’Epig. pp. 227 ff.]

[Footnote 331:  See authorities quoted by Maspero, T’oung Pao, 1910, p. 329.]

[Footnote 332:  Finot in B.E.F.E.O. 1904, pp. 918 and 922.]

[Footnote 333:  Corpus, II. Stele de Po Nagar, pp. 252 ff. and Stele de Yang Tikuh, p. 208, etc.]

[Footnote 334:  The statements that they came from Java and were cannibals occur in different inscriptions and may conceivably refer to two bodies of invaders.  But the dates are very near.  Probably Java is not the island now so called.  See the chapter on Camboja, sec. 2.  The undoubted references in the inscriptions of Champa to the island of Java call it Yavadvipa.]

[Footnote 335:  Veth.  Java, I. p. 233.]

[Footnote 336:  See “La Chronique Royale,” B.E.F.E.O. 1905, p. 377.]

[Footnote 337:  Corpus, II. p. 259.  Jinendra may be a name either of the Buddha or of a grammarian.  The mention of the Kasika vritti is important as showing that this work must be anterior to the ninth century.  The Uttara Kalpa is quoted in the Tantras (see Bergaigne’s note), but nothing is known of it.]

[Footnote 338:  B.E.F.E.O. 1904, p. 973.]

[Footnote 339:  From Mi-son, date 1157 A.D.  See B.E.F.E.O. 1904, pp. 961 and 963.]

[Footnote 340:  = Chinese Mei shan, beautiful mountain.  For an account of the temples and their history see the articles by Parmentier and Finot, B.E.F.E.O. 1904, pp. 805-977.]

[Footnote 341:  But contemporary inscriptions have been discovered. B.E.F.E.O. 1902, pp. 185 ff.]

[Footnote 342:  Doubtless because the capital was transferred to the south where the shrine of Po-nagar had rival claims.]