My dear Swinton,—­ ...  I have just received an invitation to go to lecture in Sydney on Sundays for three months, with an intimation that other lectures can be arranged for in Melbourne and New Zealand.  It is tempting!...  If I had the prospect of clearing L1,000 by a lecturing campaign I would go, though it would require a great effort....  I did not think it possible even to contemplate going so far again, but the chance of earning a lot of money which would enable me to clear off this house and leave something for my family must be seriously considered.—­Yours very truly,

ALFRED R. WALLACE.

* * * * *

TO MISS VIOLET WALLACE

Parkstone, Dorset.  May 10, 1891.

My dear Violet,—­ ...  I am quite in favour of a legal eight hours’ day.  Overtime need not be forbidden, but every man who works overtime should have a legal claim to double wages for the extra hours.  That would make it cheaper for the master to employ two sets of men working each eight hours when they had long jobs requiring them, while for the necessities of finishing contracts, etc., they could well afford to pay double for the extra hours.  “It would make everything dearer!” Of course it would!  How else can you produce a more equal distribution of wealth than by making the rich and idle pay more and the workers receive more?  “The workers would have to pay more, too, for everything they bought!” True again, but what they paid more would not equal their extra earnings, because a large portion of the extra pay to the men will be paid by the rich, and only the remainder paid by the men themselves.  The eight hours’ day and double pay for overtime would not only employ thousands now out of work, but would actually raise wages per hour and per day.  This is clear, because wages are kept down wholly by the surplus supply of labour in every trade.  The moment the surplus is used up, or nearly so, by more men being required on account of shorter hours, competition among the men becomes less; among the employers, for men, more:  hence necessarily higher wages all round.  As to the bogey of foreign competition, it is a bogey only.  All the political economists agree that if wages are raised in all trades, it will not in the least affect our power to export goods as profitably as now.  Look and see!  And, secondly, the eight hours’ movement is an international one, and will affect all alike in the end.

There are some arguments for you!  Poor unreasoning infant!!...

* * * * *

REV.  AUGUSTUS JESSOPP TO A.R.  WALLACE

Scarning Rectory, East Dereham.  August 25, 1893.

My dear Mr. Wallace,—­I have put off writing to thank you for your kind letter, and the book and pamphlets you were good enough to send me, because I hoped in acknowledgment to say I had read your little volumes, as I intend to.  The fates have been against me, and I will delay no longer thanking you for sending them to me.