native land—­which Germany had sworn, not only to respect but, if need be, to defend.  And yet, in many countries pharisees reading these lines will go forward tranquilly to their churches, or their temples, or their banking houses, or their foreign offices, saying:  “In what do these things concern us?” “Ja, ja, this is war.”  Yes, it is war, but war such as was never made by the soldiers of Marceau, such as never will be made by the soldiers of Joffre, such as never has been made and never will be made by France—­“Mother of Arts, of Arms, and of Laws.”  Yes, it is war, but war such as Attila would not have carried on if he had subscribed to certain stipulations; for, in subscribing them, he would have awakened to the notion, which alone distinguishes the civilized man from the barbarian, distinguishes a nation from a horde—­respect for the word once given.  Yes, it is war, but war the theory of which could only be made up by such pedant megalomaniacs as the Julius von Hartmanns, the Bernhardis, and the Treitschkes; the theory which accords to the elect people the right to uproot from the laws and customs of war what centuries of humanity, of Christianity, and chivalry have at great pains injected into it; the theory of systematic and organized ferocity; today exposed to public reprobation, not only as an odious thing, but no less silly and absurd.  For have we not reached the ridiculous when the incendiaries of Louvain, and Malines, and Rheims, the assassins of women and children, and of the wounded, already find it necessary to repudiate their actions, at least in words, and to impose upon the servility of their ninety-three Kulturtraeger such denials as this:  “It is not true that we are making war in contempt of the law of nations, nor that our soldiers are committing acts of cruelty, or of insubordination, or indiscipline....  We will carry this conflict through to the end as a civilized people, and we answer for this upon our good name and upon our honor!” Why this humble and pitiful repudiation?  Perhaps because their theory of war rested upon the postulate of their invincibility, and that, in the first shiver of their defeat upon the Marne, it collapsed, and now their repudiation quickly follows—­in dread of the lex talionis.

[Illustration:  Figure 17.]

[Illustration:  Figure 18. [Continuation of Figure 17.]]

I will stop here.  I leave the conclusion to the allied armies, already in sight of victory.

NOTE.—­General Stenger’s order of the day, mentioned on page [Transcriber’s Note:  blank in original], was communicated orally by various officers in various units of the brigade.  Consequently, the form in which we have received it may possibly be incomplete or altered.  In face of any doubt, the French Government has ordered an inquiry to be made into the prisoners’ camps.  Not one of the prisoners to whom our magistrates presented the order of the day in the above-mentioned