Let us illustrate by standing at the centre, the Common itself.  As far back as 1828, when they knew nothing about “practical politics” as compared with what we know now, a tariff bill was passed which was called the “Tariff of Abominations,” because it had no beginning nor end nor plan.  It had no traceable pattern in it.  It was as if the demands of everybody in the United States had all been thrown indiscriminately into one basket and that basket presented as a piece of legislation.  It had been a general scramble and everybody who scrambled hard enough had been taken care of in the schedules resulting.  It was an abominable thing to the thoughtful men of that day, because no man guided it, shaped it, or tried to make an equitable system out of it.  That was bad enough, but at least everybody had an open door through which to scramble for his advantage.  It was a go-as-you-please, free-for-all struggle, and anybody who could get to Washington and say he represented an important business interest could be heard by the Committee on Ways and Means.

We have a very different state of affairs now.  The Committee on Ways and Means and the Finance Committee of the Senate in these sophisticated days have come to discriminate by long experience among the persons whose counsel they are to take in respect of tariff legislation.  There has been substituted for the unschooled body of citizens that used to clamor at the doors of the Finance Committee and the Committee on Ways and Means, one of the most interesting and able bodies of expert lobbyists that has ever been developed in the experience of any country,—­men who know so much about the matters they are talking of that you cannot put your knowledge into competition with theirs.  They so overwhelm you with their familiarity with detail that you cannot discover wherein their scheme lies.  They suggest the change of an innocent fraction in a particular schedule and explain it to you so plausibly that you cannot see that it means millions of dollars additional from the consumers of this country.  They propose, for example, to put the carbon for electric lights in two-foot pieces instead of one-foot pieces,—­and you do not see where you are getting sold, because you are not an expert.  If you will get some expert to go through the schedules of the present Payne-Aldrich tariff, you will find a “nigger” concealed in almost every woodpile,—­some little word, some little clause, some unsuspected item, that draws thousands of dollars out of the pockets of the consumer and yet does not seem to mean anything in particular.  They have calculated the whole thing beforehand; they have analyzed the whole detail and consequence, each one in his specialty.  With the tariff specialist the average business man has no possibility of competition.  Instead of the old scramble, which was bad enough, we get the present expert control of the tariff schedules.  Thus the relation between business and government becomes, not a matter of the exposure of all the sensitive parts of the government to all the active parts of the people, but the special impression upon them of a particular organized force in the business world.