reserves, limitations, and alternative hypotheses.  Il y a serpent et serpent; a snake tribe may be a local tribe named from the Snake River, not a totem kindred.  The history of mythology is the history of rash, premature, and exclusive theories.  We are only beginning to learn caution.  Even the prevalent anthropological theory of the ghost-origin of religion might, I think, be advanced with caution (as Mr. Jevons argues on other grounds) till we know a little more about ghosts and a great deal more about psychology.  We are too apt to argue as if the psychical condition of the earliest men were exactly like our own; while we are just beginning to learn, from Prof.  William James, that about even our own psychical condition we are only now realising our exhaustive ignorance.  How often we men have thought certain problems settled for good!  How often we have been compelled humbly to return to our studies!  Philological comparative mythology seemed securely seated for a generation.  Her throne is tottering: 

   Our little systems have their day,
      They have their day and cease to be,
      They are but broken lights from Thee,
   And Thou, we trust, art more than they.

But we need not hate each other for the sake of our little systems, like the grammarian who damned his rival’s soul for his ’theory of the irregular verbs.’  Nothing, I hope, is said here inconsistent with the highest esteem for Mr. Max Muller’s vast erudition, his enviable style, his unequalled contributions to scholarship, and his awakening of that interest in mythological science without which his adversaries would probably never have existed.

Most of Chapter XII. appeared in the ‘Contemporary Review,’ and most of Chapter XIII. in the ‘Princeton Review.’

REGENT MYTHOLOGY

Mythology in 1860-1880

Between 1860 and 1880, roughly speaking, English people interested in early myths and religions found the mythological theories of Professor Max Muller in possession of the field.  These brilliant and attractive theories, taking them in the widest sense, were not, of course, peculiar to the Right Hon. Professor.  In France, in Germany, in America, in Italy, many scholars agreed in his opinion that the science of language is the most potent spell for opening the secret chamber of mythology.  But while these scholars worked on the same general principle as Mr. Max Muller, while they subjected the names of mythical beings—­Zeus, Helen, Achilles, Athene—­to philological analysis, and then explained the stories of gods and heroes by their interpretations of the meanings of their names, they arrived at all sorts of discordant results.  Where Mr. Max Muller found a myth of the Sun or of the Dawn, these scholars were apt to see a myth of the wind, of the lightning, of the thunder-cloud, of the crepuscule, of the upper air, of what each of them pleased.  But these