Ireland Under Coercion (2nd ed.) (1 of 2) (1888) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 245 pages of information about Ireland Under Coercion (2nd ed.) (1 of 2) (1888).

Ireland Under Coercion (2nd ed.) (1 of 2) (1888) eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 245 pages of information about Ireland Under Coercion (2nd ed.) (1 of 2) (1888).

Sir George Cornewall Lewis’s speech of October 17, 1862, was a most skilful and masterly attempt to protect the Cabinet against the consequences of what the Times, on the 9th of October, had treated as the “indiscretion or treason” of his colleague.  But it did not save the Government from the scourge of Mr. Disraeli, or much mitigate the effect in America of Mr. Gladstone’s performance at Newcastle, which was a much more serious matter from the American point of view than any of the speeches recently delivered about “Home Rule” in the American Senate can be fairly said to be from the British point of view.

NOTE B.

MR. PARNELL AND THE DYNAMITERS. (Prologue, p. xxxiii.)

The relation of Mr. Parnell and his Parliamentary associates to what is called the extreme and “criminal” section of the Irish American Revolutionary Party can only be understood by those who understand that it is the ultimate object of this party not to effect reforms in the administration of Ireland as an integral part of the British Empire, but to sever absolutely the political connection between Ireland and the British Empire.  Loyal British subjects necessarily consider this object a “criminal” object, just as loyal Austrian subjects considered the object of the Italian Revolutionists of 1848 to be a “criminal” object.  But the Italian Revolutionists of 1848 did not accept this view of their object.  On the contrary, they held their end to be so high and holy that it more or less sanctified even assassination when planned as a means to that end.  Why should the Italian Revolutionists of 1848 be judged by one standard and the Irish Revolutionists of 1888 by another?

If Mr. Parnell and his Parliamentary associates were to declare in unequivocal terms their absolute loyalty to the British Crown, and their determination to maintain in all circumstances the political connection between Great Britain and Ireland, they might or might not retain their hold upon Mr. Davitt and upon their constituents in Ireland, but they would certainly put themselves beyond the pale of support by the great Irish American organisations.  Nor do I believe they could retain the confidence of those organisations if it were supposed that they really regarded the most extreme and violent of the Irish Revolutionists, the “Invincibles” and the “dynamiters” as “criminals,” in the sense in which the “Invincibles” and the “dynamiters” are so regarded by the rest of the civilised world.  Can it, for example, be doubted that any English or Scottish public man who co-operates with Mr. Parnell and his Parliamentary associates would instantly hand over to the police any “Invincible” or “dynamiter” who might come within his reach?  And can it for a moment be believed that Mr. Parnell, or any one of his Parliamentary associates, would do this?  There are thousands of Irish citizens in the United States who felt all the horror and indignation expressed

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Ireland Under Coercion (2nd ed.) (1 of 2) (1888) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.