In the beginning—as a detail of the project
when it was yet a joke —I had framed a
humble and beseeching and perfervid petition to Congress
begging the government to built the monument, as a
testimony of the Great Republic’s gratitude
to the Father of the Human Race and as a token of
her loyalty to him in this dark day of humiliation
when his older children were doubting and deserting
him. It seemed to me that this petition ought
to be presented, now—it would be widely
and feelingly abused and ridiculed and cursed, and
would advertise our scheme and make our ground-floor
stock go off briskly. So I sent it to General
Joseph R. Hawley, who was then in the House, and he
said he would present it. But he did not do it.
I think he explained that when he came to read it
he was afraid of it: it was too serious, to gushy,
too sentimental—the House might take it
for earnest.
We ought to have carried out our monument scheme;
we could have managed it without any great difficulty,
and Elmira would now be the most celebrated town in
the universe.
Very recently I began to build a book in which one
of the minor characters touches incidentally upon
a project for a monument to Adam, and now the Tribune
has come upon a trace of the forgotten jest of thirty
years ago. Apparently mental telegraphy is still
in business. It is odd; but the freaks of mental
telegraphy are usually odd.
A HUMANE WORD FROM SATAN
[The following letter, signed by Satan and purporting
to come from him, we have reason to believe was not
written by him, but by Mark Twain. —Editor.]
Totheeditorof HARPER’S
Weekly:
Dear Sir and Kinsman,—Let us have done
with this frivolous talk. The American Board
accepts contributions from me every year: then
why shouldn’t it from Mr. Rockefeller?
In all the ages, three-fourths of the support of the
great charities has been conscience-money, as my books
will show: then what becomes of the sting when
that term is applied to Mr. Rockefeller’s gift?
The American Board’s trade is financed mainly
from the graveyards. Bequests, you understand.
Conscience-money. Confession of an old crime
and deliberate perpetration of a new one; for deceased’s
contribution is a robbery of his heirs. Shall
the Board decline bequests because they stand for
one of these offenses every time and generally for
both?
Allow me to continue. The charge must persistently
and resentfully and remorselessly dwelt upon is that
Mr. Rockefeller’s contribution is incurably
tainted by perjury—perjury proved against
him in the courts. Itmakesussmile—down in my place! Because
there isn’t a rich man in your vast city who
doesn’t perjure himself every year before the
tax board. They are all caked with perjury, many
layers thick. Iron-clad, so to speak. If
there is one that isn’t, I desire to acquire
Copyrights
The 30,000 Dollar Bequest and Other Stories from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.