An English Grammar eBook

James Witt Sewell
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 358 pages of information about An English Grammar.

An English Grammar eBook

James Witt Sewell
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 358 pages of information about An English Grammar.

     Struggling for life, each almost bursting their sinews to
     force the other off.—­PAULDING.

     Whosoever hath any gold, let them break it off.—­Bible.

     Nobody knows what it is to lose a friend, till they have lost
     him.—­FIELDING.

     Where she was gone, or what was become of her, no one could
     take upon them to say.—­SHERIDAN.

     I do not mean that I think any one to blame for taking due care
     of their health.—­ADDISON.

Exercise.—­In the above sentences, unless both genders are implied, change the pronoun to agree with its antecedent.

RELATIVE PRONOUNS.

I. RESTRICTIVE AND UNRESTRICTIVE RELATIVES.

[Sidenote:  What these terms mean.]

412.  As to their conjunctive use, the definite relatives who, which, and that may be cooerdinating or restrictive.

A relative, when cooerdinating, or unrestrictive, is equivalent to a conjunction (and, but, because, etc.) and a personal pronoun.  It adds a new statement to what precedes, that being considered already clear; as, “I gave it to the beggar, who went away.”  This means, “I gave it to the beggar [we know which one], and he went away.”

A relative, when restrictive, introduces a clause to limit and make clear some preceding word.  The clause is restricted to the antecedent, and does not add a new statement; it merely couples a thought necessary to define the antecedent:  as, “I gave it to a beggar who stood at the gate.”  It defines beggar.

413.  It is sometimes contended that who and which should always be cooerdinating, and that always restrictive; but, according to the practice of every modern writer, the usage must be stated as follows:—­

[Sidenote:  A loose rule the only one to be formulated.]

Who and which are either cooerdinating or restrictive, the taste of the writer and regard for euphony being the guide.

That is in most cases restrictive, the cooerdinating use not being often found among careful writers.

Exercise.

In the following examples, tell whether who, which, and that are restrictive or not, in each instance:—­

[Sidenote:  Who.]

     1.  “Here he is now!” cried those who stood near
     Ernest.—­HAWTHORNE.

     2.  He could overhear the remarks of various individuals, who were
     comparing the features with the face on the mountain side.—­Id.

     3.  The particular recording angel who heard it pretended not to
     understand, or it might have gone hard with the tutor.—­HOLMES.

     4.  Yet how many are there who up, down, and over England are
     saying, etc.—­H.W.  BEECHER

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
An English Grammar from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.