Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 125 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 125 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885.

Siphon tanks, such as are advised by many sanitarians, that were used first in this country, I believe, by Mr. Waring, I have not been very successful with.  Obstructions get into the siphon and stop it up, or it gets choked with grease.  I prefer a tight tank, provided with a tell-tale, and that is to be opened either by a valve operated by hand, or that is arranged with a standing overflow like a bath tub, and that can be raised and secured by a hook.

* * * * *

SANITARY COOKING.[5]

[Footnote 5:  Read before the Indiana State Sanitary Society, Seymour, March 13, 1884.—­The Sanitarian.]

By VIRGINIA L. OPPENHEIMER, M.D., Seymour, Ind.

    “We may live without poetry, music, and art,
    We may live without conscience, and live without heart,
    We may live without friends,
    We may live without books,
    But civilized man cannot live without cooks.

    “We may live without books—­
    What is knowledge but grieving? 
    We may live without hope—­
    What is hope but deceiving? 
    We may live without love—­what is passion but pining? 
    But where is the man that can live without dining?”

Thus saith the poet, and forthwith turns the world over into the hands of the cook.  And into what better hands could you fall?  To you, my fat, jolly, four-meals-a-day friend, Mr. Gourmand, but more especially to you, my somber, lean, dyspeptic, two-meals-a-day friend, Mr. Grumbler, the cook is indeed a valuable friend.  The cook wields a scepter that is only second in power to that of love; and even love has become soured through the evil instrumentality of the good-looking or bad-cooking cook.  This is no jest, it is a very sad fact.

Now, the question arises, how can the cook preserve the health of her patrons, maintain happiness in the family, and yet not throw the gourmands into bankruptcy?  Very simple, I assure you.

1.  You must have the cook.  I mean by this, that not every one can occupy that important office.  The greatest consideration in the qualities of a cook is, does she like the work?  No one can fulfill the duties of any noteworthy office unless he labors at them with vim and willingness.

2.  You must have good articles of food originally.

3.  As our honest Iago said, “You must have change.”

When one arrives at adult age, he should have learned by experience what articles of food do, and what articles of food do not, agree with him, and to shun the latter, no matter how daintily served or how tempting the circumstances.  The man who knows that pates de foie gras, or the livers of abnormally fattened geese, disagree with him, and still eats them, is not to be pitied when all the horrors of dyspepsia overtake him.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 484, April 11, 1885 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.