type of a depraved class which very unjustly represented the Liberal party in Rome before 1870, and which, among those who witnessed its proceedings, drew upon the great political body which demanded the unity of Italy an opprobrium that body was very far from deserving.  The honest and upright Liberals were waiting in 1866.  What they did, they did from their own country, and they did it boldly.  To no man of intelligence need I say that Del Ferice had no more affinity with Massimo D’Azeglio, with the great Cavour, with Cavour’s great enemy Giuseppe Mazzini, or with Garibaldi, than the jackal has with the lion.  Del Ferice represented the scum which remained after the revolution of 1848 had subsided.  He was one of those men who were used and despised by their betters, and in using whom Cavour himself was provoked into writing “Se noi facessimo per noi quel che faciamo per l’Italia, saremmo gran bricconi”—­if we did for ourselves what we do for Italy, we should be great blackguards.  And that there were honourable and just men outside of Rome will sufficiently appear in the sequel to this veracious tale.

THE END.