Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886.

A case in point will illustrate this.  While Dr. Dyrenforth was chief of the chemical division of the U.S.  Patent Office, a person applied for a patent on what he called “cottonized silk,” inclosing specimens.  He claimed that he had discovered a mode of covering cotton fiber with a solution of silk which could be woven into goods of various kinds; in order to satisfy the public of the reality of his invention, he placed on exhibition, in various localities, specimens of silk-like goods in the form of ribbons in the web and skeins of thread, representing them to be “cottonized silk.”

Dr. Dyrenforth was not satisfied that the so-called discovery was an accomplished fact, and he forwarded a few fibers of the material to the division of which I have charge for investigation.  I subjected them to my usual tests, and found them to consist of pure silk, and I so reported to Dr. Dyrenforth, who rejected the application for a patent.  The microscope was thus usefully employed to protect capitalists from imposition.

METHODS EMPLOYED.

It may be well to state briefly the methods I employed in detecting the real character of the material.  The fibers were first viewed under plain transmitted light, secondly, polarized light and selenite plate.  Since silk and cotton are polarizing bodies, “cottonized silk,” if such could be made as described, would give, in this case, the prismatic colors of both fibers, and the complementary colors would differ greatly because of the great disparity of their respective polarizing and refractive powers.

The fact will be observed that a cotton fiber presents the appearance of a twisted ribbon when viewed by the microscope, while silk, owing to its cylindrical form, cannot twist on itself.  It should also be considered that the diameter of “cottonized silk,” so called, would be greater than that of a fiber of silk, because the silk solution would have to be applied to an actual thread of cotton, and not to a single cotton fiber, by reason of the shortness of the original hairs of the latter.  Were a single fiber of such a combination put under a suitable objective, and a drop of nitric acid brought in contact with the fiber, it would be seen that the acid would destroy the silk and leave the fibers of cotton untouched, the latter being insoluble in cold nitric acid.  The action of muriatic acid is similar in this respect.  Were a fiber of cotton present and a drop of pure sulphuric acid placed on it, followed quickly by a drop of a transparent solution of the tincture of iodine, a peculiar change in the fiber would take place, provided the right proportion of acid be used.  Cotton fiber, and especially flax fiber, under such conditions, forms into disks or beads of a beautiful blue color.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.