Scientific American Supplement, No. 803, May 23, 1891 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 125 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 803, May 23, 1891.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 803, May 23, 1891 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 125 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 803, May 23, 1891.

Many different forms have been given to the heads of projectiles, as flat, ogival, hemispherical, conoidal, parabolic, blunt trifaced, etc.

The flat headed projectile has the shape of a right cylinder, and acts like a punch, driving the material of the armor plate in front of it.  These projectiles are especially valuable when firing at oblique armor, for they will bite or cut into the armor when striking at an angle of thirty degrees.

The ogival head acts more as a wedge, pushing the metal aside, and generally will give more penetration in thick solid plates than the flat headed projectile.  The ogival head is usually designed by using a radius of two calibers.

The hemispherical, conoidal, parabolic and blunt trifaced all give more or less of the wedging effect.  The blunt trifaced has all the good qualities of the ogival of two calibers.  It bites at a slightly less angle, and the three faces start cracks radiating from the point of impact.

Forged steel is the best material for armor-piercing projectiles, but many are made of chilled cast iron, on account of its great hardness and cheapness.

The best weight for a projectile is found by the formula

    w = d cubed (0.45 to 0.5)

w being the weight in pounds, d the diameter in inches and 0.45 to 0.5 having been determined by experiment.

With a light projectile we get a flat trajectory, and accuracy at short ranges is increased.  With a heavy projectile the resistance of the air has less effect and the projectile is advantageously employed at long ranges.

In the following formulae, used in calculating the penetration of projectiles in rolled iron armor,

g = the force of gravity. w = the weight of projectile in pounds. d = the diameter of projectile in inches. v = the striking velocity in feet per second.  P = the penetration in inches.

Major Noble, R.A., gives

_________________
1.6 /      w v squared
P =  /\  /  ----------------
\/   [pi] g d 11334.4

[TEX:  P = \sqrt[1.6]{\frac{w \ v^2}{\pi \ g \ d \ 11334.4}}]

U.S.  Naval Ordnance Proving Ground uses

________________
2.035/      w v squared
P =  /\  /  ---------------
\/   [pi] g d 3852.8

[TEX:  P = \sqrt[2.035]{\frac{w \ v^2}{\pi \ g \ d \ 3852.8}}]

Col.  Maitland gives

w v squared
P =  ------------
g d squared 16654.4

[TEX:  P = \frac{w \ v^2}{g \ d^2 \ 16654.4}]

Maitland’s latest formula, now used in England, is

_
v w
P = ----- \
- - 0.14 d
608.3 d

[TEX:  P = \frac{v}{608.3} \sqrt{\frac{w}{d}} — 0.14 \ d]

General Froloff, Russian army, gives

w v
P = ------
d squared 576

[TEX:  P = \frac{w \ v}{d^2 \ 576}]

for plates less than two and one-half inches thick, and

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 803, May 23, 1891 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.