to accept the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution,
with the douceur of a land grant, or to reject
it. If they accepted it, the State was to be
admitted at once; if they rejected it, they were not
to be admitted until the population should reach the
number which was required for electing a member to
the House of Representatives. At present the
population was far short of this number, and therefore
rejection involved a long delay in acquiring statehood.
Douglas very justly assailed the unfairness of a proposal
by which an anti-slavery vote was thus doubly and
very severely handicapped; but the bill was passed
by both Houses of Congress and was signed by the President.
The Kansans, however, by an enormous majority,[74]
rejected the bribes of land and statehood in connection
with slavery. For his action concerning the Lecompton
Constitution and the “English bill” Douglas
afterward took much credit to himself.
Such was the stage of advancement of the slavery conflict
in the country, and such the position of Douglas in
national and in state politics, when there took place
that great campaign in Illinois which made him again
senator in 1858, and made Lincoln President in 1860.
[61] For a striking comparison of the condition of
the South with that of the North in 1850, see von
Holst’s Const. Hist. of U.S. v. 567-586.
[62] December, 1845.
[63] For a description of Douglas’s state of
mind, see N. and H. i. 345-351, quoting original authorities.
[64] N. and H. i. 388.
[65] Thus when John Adams first landed in Europe,
and was asked whether he was “the great Mr.
Adams,” he said: No, the great Mr. Adams
was his cousin, Samuel Adams of Boston.
[66] For a fair and discriminating estimate of Buchanan,
see Blaine, Twenty Years in Congress, vol.
i. ch. x., especially pp. 239-241.
[67] Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut,
New York, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, all for
Fremont; Maryland for Fillmore.
[68] Tennessee and Kentucky.
[69] Dred Scott, plff. in error, vs. Sandford,
Sup. Ct. of U.S. Dec. Term, 1856, 19
Howard, 393. After the conclusion of this case
Scott was given his freedom by his master.
[70] Ante, pp. 94, 95.
[71] August 24, 1855; Holland, 145.
[72] For a good sketch of Douglas, see Elaine, Twenty
Years of Congress, i. 144.
[73] This doctrine was set forth by Douglas in a speech
at Springfield, Ill., June 12, 1857. A fortnight
later, June 26, at the same place, Lincoln answered
this speech. N. and H. ii. 85-89.
[74] By 11,300 against 1,788, August 2, 1858.
Kansas was admitted as a State at the close of January,
1861, after many of the Southern States had already
seceded.
