CONCERNING THE PROVINCE OF COLOMAN.
Coloman is a province towards the east, the people
of which are Idolaters and have a peculiar language,
and are subject to the Great Kaan. They are a
[tall and] very handsome people, though in complexion
brown rather than white, and are good soldiers.[NOTE
1] They have a good many towns, and a vast number
of villages, among great mountains, and in strong
positions.[NOTE 2]
When any of them die, the bodies are burnt, and then
they take the bones and put them in little chests.
These are carried high up the mountains, and placed
in great caverns, where they are hung up in such wise
that neither man nor beast can come at them.
A good deal of gold is found in the country, and for
petty traffic they use porcelain shells such as I
have told you of before. All these provinces
that I have been speaking of, to wit Bangala and Caugigu
and Anin, employ for currency porcelain shells and
gold. There are merchants in this country who
are very rich and dispose of large quantities of goods.
The people live on flesh and rice and milk, and brew
their wine from rice and excellent spices.
NOTE 1.—The only MSS. that afford the reading
Coloman or Choloman instead of Toloman
or Tholoman, are the Bern MS., which has Coloman
in the initial word of the chapter, Paris MS. 5649
(Pauthier’s C) which has Coloman in the
Table of Chapters, but not in the text, the Bodleian,
and the Brandenburg MS. quoted in the last note.
These variations in themselves have little weight.
But the confusion between c and t in
mediaeval MSS., when dealing with strange names, is
so constant that I have ventured to make the correction,
in strong conviction that it is the right reading.
M. Pauthier indeed, after speaking of tribes called
Lo on the south-west of China, adds, “on
les nommait To-lo-man (’les nombreux
Barbares Lo’).” Were this latter statement
founded on actual evidence we might retain that form
which is the usual reading. But I apprehend from
the manner in which M. Pauthier produces it, without
corroborative quotation, that he is rather hazarding
a conjecture than speaking with authority. Be
that as it may, it is impossible that Polo’s
Toloman or Coloman should have been in the south of
Kwangsi, where Pauthier locates it.
On the other hand, we find tribes of both Kolo
and Kihlau Barbarians (i.e. Man, whence
KOLO-MAN or Kihlau-man) very numerous on the
frontier of Kweichau. (See Bridgman’s transl.
of Tract on Meautsze, pp. 265, 269, 270, 272,
273, 274, 275, 278, 279, 280.) Among these the Kolo,
described as No. 38 in that Tract, appear to me from
various particulars to be the most probable representatives
of the Coloman of Polo, notwithstanding the sentence
with which the description opens: “Kolo
