2. These risings being desperate, with vast disadvantages,
and always suppressed, ruined all our friends; the
remnants of the Cavaliers were lessened, the stoutest
and most daring were cut off, and the king’s
interest exceedingly weakened, there not being less
than 30,000 of his best friends cut off in the several
attempts made at Maidstone, Colchester, Lancashire,
Pembroke, Pontefract, Kingston, Preston, Warrington,
Worcester, and other places. Had these men all
reserved their fortunes to a conjunction with the
Scots, at either of the invasions they made into this
kingdom, and acted with the conduct and courage they
were known masters of, perhaps neither of those Scots
armies had been defeated.
But the impatience of our friends ruined all; for
my part, I had as good a mind to put my hand to the
ruin of the enemy as any of them, but I never saw
any tolerable appearance of a force able to match the
enemy, and I had no mind to be beaten and then hanged.
Had we let them alone, they would have fallen into
so many parties and factions, and so effectually have
torn one another to pieces, that whichsoever party
had come to us, we should, with them, have been too
hard for all the rest.
This was plain by the course of things afterwards;
when the Independent army had ruffled the Presbyterian
Parliament, the soldiery of that party made no scruple
to join us, and would have restored the king with
all their hearts, and many of them did join us at last.
And the consequence, though late, ended so; for they
fell out so many times, army and Parliament, Parliament
and army, and alternately pulled one another down
so often till at last the Presbyterians who began
the war, ended it, and, to be rid of their enemies,
rather than for any love to the monarchy, restored
King Charles the Second, and brought him in on the
very day that they themselves had formerly resolved
the ruin of his father’s government, being the
29th of May, the same day twenty years that the private
cabal in London concluded their secret league with
the Scots, to embroil his father King Charles the
First.
[Footnote 1: General Ludlow, in his Memoirs,
p. 52, says their men returned from Warwick to London,
not like men who had obtained a victory, but like
men that had been beaten.]
NOTES.
p. 1. The preface to the first edition, which
appeared in 1720, was written by Defoe as “Editor”
of the manuscript. The second edition appeared
between 1740 and 1750, after the death of Defoe. (He
was probably born in 1671 and he died in 1731.) In
the preface to that edition it was argued that the
Cavalier was certainly a real person.
p. 2, l. 35. “Nicely” is here used
in the stricter and more uncommon sense of “minutely.”
This use of words in a slightly different sense from
their common modern significance will be noticed frequently;
cf. p. 8, l. 17 “passionately,” p. 18,
l. 40 “refined,” p. 31, l. 18 “particular.”
Copyrights
Memoirs of a Cavalier from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.