Camp-Fire and Cotton-Field eBook

Thomas W. Knox
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 458 pages of information about Camp-Fire and Cotton-Field.

Camp-Fire and Cotton-Field eBook

Thomas W. Knox
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 458 pages of information about Camp-Fire and Cotton-Field.

The Rebel sympathizers in St. Louis took many occasions to complain of the tyranny of the National Government.  At the outset there was a delusion that the Government had no rights that should be respected, while every possible right belonged to the Rebels.  General Lyon removed the arms from the St. Louis arsenal to a place of safety at Springfield, Illinois.  “He had no constitutional right to do that,” was the outcry of the Secessionists.  He commenced the organization of Union volunteers for the defense of the city.  The Constitution made no provision for this.  He captured Camp Jackson, and took his prisoners to the arsenal.  This, they declared, was a most flagrant violation of constitutional privileges.  He moved upon the Rebels in the interior, and the same defiance of law was alleged.  He suppressed the secession organ in St. Louis, thus trampling upon the liberties of the Rebel Press.

General Fremont declared the slaves of Rebels were free, and thus infringed upon the rights of property.  Numbers of active, persistent traitors were arrested and sent to military prisons:  a manifest tyranny on the part of the Government.  In one way and another the unfortunate and long-suffering Rebels were most sadly abused, if their own stories are to be regarded.

It was forbidden to display Rebel emblems in public:  a cruel restriction of personal right.  The wealthy Secessionists of St. Louis were assessed the sum of ten thousand dollars, for the benefit of the Union refugees from Arkansas and other points in the Southwest.  This was another outrage.  These persons could not understand why they should be called upon to contribute to the support of Union people who had been rendered houseless and penniless by Rebels elsewhere.  They made a most earnest protest, but their remonstrances were of no avail.  In default of payment of the sums assessed, their superfluous furniture was seized and sold at auction.  This was a violation of the laws that exempt household property from seizure.

The auction sale of these goods was largely attended.  The bidding was very spirited.  Pianos, ottomans, mirrors, sofas, chairs, and all the adornments of the homes of affluence, were sold for “cash in United States Treasury notes.”  Some of the parties assessed declared they would pay nothing on the assessment, but they reconsidered their decisions, and bought their own property at the auction-rooms, without regard to the prices they paid.  In subsequent assessments they found it better to pay without hesitation whatever sums were demanded of them.  They spoke and labored against the Union until they found such efforts were of no use.  They could never understand why they should not enjoy the protection of the flag without being called upon to give it material aid.

In May, 1863, another grievance was added to the list.  It became necessary, for the good of the city, to banish some of the more prominent Rebel sympathizers.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Camp-Fire and Cotton-Field from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.