6.  The inscription No. 20, plate xv offers likewise slightly corrupt and mutilated names of a ga[n.]a, a kula and a sakha, mentioned in the Kalpasutra.  In the lithographed copy lines 3-7 are hopeless and there is no rubbing to help.  The word thitu ’of a daughter’ in line 6, and the following ma.uya which is probably a misreading of matuye ‘of the mother’ show that this dedication also was made by a female.  The last four syllables vato maho are probably the remnant of another namaskara—­namo bhagavato Mahavirasya. As regards the proper names, Aryya Rehiniya is an impossible form; but on comparison with the next inscription to be mentioned, it is evident that the stone must have read Aryvodchikiyato or Aryyadehikiyato ga[n.]a[to]. [Footnote:  Wiener Zeitshe. f. d.  Kunde der Morgenl., Bd.  II, S. 142 f.] According to the Kalpasutra (S.B.E. vol.  XXII, p. 291) Arya-Roha[n.]a was the first pupil of Arya Suhastin and founded the Uddeha ga[n.]a.  The latter split up into four [’s]akhas and into six kulas.  The name of its fourth [’s]akha, Pur[n.]apatrika, closely resembles—­especially in its consonantal elements—­that of the inscription, Petaputrika, and I do not hesitate in correcting the latter to Ponapatrika which would be the equivalent of Sansk.  Paur[n.]apatrika.  Among the six kulas is the Parihasaka, and considering the other agreements, I believe it probable that the mutilated name read as Puridha.ka is a misreading of Parihaka, We may emend the first two times and read as follows,—­

L. 1. Siddha|m| namo arahato Mahavir|a|sya devana[’s]asya
| rajna  Vasudevasya sa[.m]vatsare 90 + 8
varshamase + divase 10 | 1 etasya.

2. purvv|a|y|e| Aryyo-D|e|h|i|kiyato ga[n.]a|to|
P|a|vi|hasa|k|a|kula|to| P|ou|ap|a|trikat|o| [’s]akato ga[n.]|i|sya
Aryya-Devadatta|sya| na... ...

  3. ryya-Kshemasya

  4. prakagiri[n.]e

  5. kihadiye praja

  6. tasya Pravarakasya dhitu Vara[n.]asya gatvakasya
  ma|t|uya Mitra(?)sa ...datta ga

  7. ye..|namo bhaga|vato mah|avirasya|

and the translation (so far) will be,—­

“Success!  Adoration to the Arhat Mahavira, the destroyer(?) of the gods.  In the year of king Vasudeva, 98, in the month 4 of the rainy season, on the day 11—­on the above date ... of the chief of the school (ga[n.]in) Aryya-Devadata (Devadatta) out of the school (ga[n.]a) of the Aryya-Udehikiya (Arya-Uddehikiya), out of the Parihasaka line (kula), out of the Ponapatrika (Paur[n.]apatrika) branch ([’s]akha).” [Footnote:  At a later date Dr. Buehler added other proofs from inscriptions of the authenticity of the Jaina tradition, in the Vienna Oriental Journal, vol.  II, pp. 141-146; vol.  III, pp. 233-240; vol.  IV, pp. 169-173, 313-318;