get up school-exercises on any given subject in a masterly manner at twenty, and who at forty are either where they were—­or retrograde, if they are men of sense and modesty.  The reason is, their vanity is weaned, after the first hey-day and animal spirits of youth are flown, from making an affected display of knowledge, which, however useful, is not their own, and may be much more simply stated; they are tired of repeating the same arguments over and over again, after having exhausted and rung the changes on their whole stock for a number of times.  Sir James Mackintosh is understood to be a writer in the Edinburgh Review; and the articles attributed to him there are full of matter of great pith and moment.  But they want the trim, pointed expression, the ambitious ornaments, the ostentatious display and rapid volubility of his early productions.  We have heard it objected to his later compositions, that his style is good as far as single words and phrases are concerned, but that his sentences are clumsy and disjointed, and that these make up still more awkward and sprawling paragraphs.  This is a nice criticism, and we cannot speak to its truth:  but if the fact be so, we think we can account for it from the texture and obvious process of the author’s mind.  All his ideas may be said to be given preconceptions.  They do not arise, as it were, out of the subject, or out of one another at the moment, and therefore do not flow naturally and gracefully from one another.  They have been laid down beforehand in a sort of formal division or frame-work of the understanding; and the connexion between the premises and the conclusion, between one branch of a subject and another, is made out in a bungling and unsatisfactory manner.  There is no principle of fusion in the work:  he strikes after the iron is cold, and there is a want of malleability in the style.  Sir James is at present said to be engaged in writing a History of England after the downfall of the house of Stuart.  May it be worthy of the talents of the author, and of the principles of the period it is intended to illustrate!

[Footnote A:  The late Rev. Joseph Fawcett, of Walthamstow.]

[Footnote B:  At the time when the Vindiciae Gallicae first made its appearance, as a reply to the Reflections on the French Revolution, it was cried up by the partisans of the new school, as a work superior in the charms of composition to its redoubted rival:  in acuteness, depth, and soundness of reasoning, of course there was supposed to be no comparison.]

* * * * *

MR. WORDSWORTH.