Alcestis eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 54 pages of information about Alcestis.

Title:  Alcestis

Author:  Euripides

Release Date:  December 23, 2003 [EBook #10523]

Language:  English

Character set encoding:  ASCII

*** Start of this project gutenberg EBOOK Alcestis ***

Produced by Ted Garvin, Charles M. Bidwell and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team.

THE ALCESTIS

OF

EURIPIDES

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH RHYMING VERSE

WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES BY

GILBERT MURRAY, LL D, D LITT, FBA

REGIUS PROFESSOR OF GREEK IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

1915

INTRODUCTION

The Alcestis would hardly confirm its author’s right to be acclaimed “the most tragic of the poets.”  It is doubtful whether one can call it a tragedy at all.  Yet it remains one of the most characteristic and delightful of Euripidean dramas, as well as, by modern standards, the most easily actable.  And I notice that many judges who display nothing but a fierce satisfaction in sending other plays of that author to the block or the treadmill, show a certain human weakness in sentencing the gentle daughter of Pelias.

The play has been interpreted in many different ways.  There is the old unsophisticated view, well set forth in Paley’s preface of 1872.  He regards the Alcestis simply as a triumph of pathos, especially of “that peculiar sort of pathos which comes most home to us, with our views and partialities for domestic life....  As for the characters, that of Alcestis must be acknowledged to be pre-eminently beautiful.  One could almost imagine that Euripides had not yet conceived that bad opinion of the sex which so many of the subsequent dramas exhibit....  But the rest are hardly well-drawn, or, at least, pleasingly portrayed.”  “The poet might perhaps, had he pleased, have exhibited Admetus in a more amiable point of view.”

This criticism is not very trenchant, but its weakness is due, I think, more to timidity of statement than to lack of perception.  Paley does see that a character may be “well-drawn” without necessarily being “pleasing”; and even that he may be eminently pleasing as a part of the play while very displeasing in himself.  He sees that Euripides may have had his own reasons for not making Admetus an ideal husband.  It seems odd that such points should need mentioning; but Greek drama has always suffered from a school of critics who approach a play with a greater equipment of aesthetic theory than of dramatic perception.  This is the characteristic defect of classicism.  One mark of the school is to demand from dramatists heroes and heroines which shall satisfy its own ideals; and, though there was in the New Comedy a mask known to Pollux as “The Entirely-good Young Man” ([Greek:  panchraestos neaniskos]), such a character is fortunately unknown to classical Greek drama.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Alcestis from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.
Follow Us on Facebook