In the following essay, Walker provides an overview of Udall's life and career as well as an in-depth analysis of Respublica.

In the following essay, Pittenger examines material connected with Udall and attempts to gain insight into his suspected relationships with his pupils.

In the following essay, Plumstead reads Ralph Roister Doister as a parody of medieval chivalric heroes.

In the first essay below, Edgerton analyzes Floures for Latine Spekynge in terms of what it reveals about Tudor education and as its relationship to Ralph Roister Doister. In the second and third essays, he examines Udall's intentions and style in his translations of Erasmus.

In the following essay, Norland examines Ralph Roister Doister in light of its innovation and mode of story telling.

In the following essay, Axton examines the drama Thersites and compares Udall's work with earlier versions of the story.

In the following essay, Peery considers the prayer at the close of Ralph Roister Doister, arguing that it is addressed to Queen Mary, rather than Queen Elizabeth, as is often assumed. This contention has implications for the dating of the play and the authorship of the prayer.

In the following essay, Nethercot discusses Udall's career and examines his major work, Ralph Roister Doister.