|
|
There are 49 critical essays on Ian Hamilton (critic).
Critical Essays on Ian Hamilton (critic)

from source:

Critical Review by Sanford Pinsker
5,438 words, approx. 18 pages
 In the following review, Pinsker asserts that Hamilton's Walking Possession is witty, enjoyable, and thought-provoking.
from source:

Critical Review by Ann Hulbert
5,161 words, approx. 17 pages
 In the following essay, Hulbert discusses Hamilton’s Keepers of the Flame, and E. M. Forster: A Biography, by Nicola Beauman. Hulbert asserts that Hamilton's approach to his subject matter is scholarly and even-handed.
from source:

Critical Review by Robert Richman
4,338 words, approx. 15 pages
 In the following review of Robert Lowell, Richman applauds Hamilton's extensive research into primary sources, but criticizes him for failing to adequately examine Lowell's intellectual development.
from source:

Critical Review by Helen Vendler
4,308 words, approx. 14 pages
 In the following review of A Gift Imprisoned, Vendler questions Hamilton's assessment of Arnold's life and work.
from source:

Critical Review by Philip Horne
3,982 words, approx. 13 pages
 In the following review, Horne asserts that Hamilton's Keepers of the Flame and In Search of J. D. Salinger address ongoing debates over intellectual property rights and other ethical issues surrounding literary biography.
from source:

Critical Review by Hallman Bryant
3,806 words, approx. 13 pages
 In the following review of A Gift Imprisoned, Bryant comments that Hamilton's central thesis on Arnold is convincing, but that he provides no new biographical information on the poet. Bryant praises Hamilton's brief commentaries on specific poems by Arnold.
from source:

Critical Review by Bevis Hillier
3,425 words, approx. 11 pages
 In the following review of The Penguin Book of Twentieth Century Essays, selected by Hamilton, Hillier explores varying definitions of the essay form, and questions Hamilton's choices for this anthology.
from source:

Critical Review by John Simon
3,343 words, approx. 11 pages
 In the following review, Simon praises Hamilton's Walking Possession as thought-provoking, witty, and entertaining.
from source:

Critical Review by Edward Butscher
2,887 words, approx. 10 pages
 In the following review essay, Butscher discusses The Penguin Book of Twentieth Century Essays, edited by Hamilton, and The Best American Essays of the Century, edited by Joyce Carol Oates and Robert Atwan. Butscher assertss that Hamilton's choice of essays for the Penguin anthology is ultimately disappointing.
from source:

Critical Review by John Simon
2,887 words, approx. 10 pages
 In the following review of Robert Lowell, Simon praises Hamilton for extensive research and enjoyable writing style.
from source:

Critical Review by Thomas Mallon
2,024 words, approx. 7 pages
 In the following review, Mallon praises Hamilton's Keepers of the Flame, asserting that it addresses basic and enduring issues about literary biography.
from source:

Critical Review by V. S. Pritchett
1,752 words, approx. 6 pages
 In the following review of The Little Magazines, Pritchett provides an overview of Hamilton's discussion of each of six literary magazines and their editors. He praises Hamilton's writing as funny and ironic but also fair and even-handed.
from source:

Critical Review by Karl Miller
1,684 words, approx. 6 pages
 In the following review, Miller offers a favorable assessment of Hamilton's Against Oblivion.
from source:

Critical Review by Robert Ward
1,629 words, approx. 5 pages
 In the following review, Ward asserts that Hamilton's Writers in Hollywood is an enjoyable read and provides a good general introduction to the history of Hollywood screenwriting.
from source:

Critical Review by Phoebe Pettingell
1,533 words, approx. 5 pages
 In the following review of Robert Lowell, Pettingell comments that Hamilton's biography “illuminates Lowell's poetry through a profound understanding of his life.”
from source:

Critical Review by Victoria Glendinning
1,516 words, approx. 5 pages
 In the following review, Glendinning asserts that Hamilton's Keepers of the Flame is entertaining and thought-provoking, but that it contains some factual errors.
from source:

Critical Essay by Hugo Williams
1,478 words, approx. 5 pages
 In the following essay, Williams offers his own personal reminiscences of working with Hamilton on the New Review during the 1970s. Williams comments on the parallels between the life of Matthew Arnold, as described in Hamilton's A Gift Imprisoned, and Hamilton's own life.
from source:

Critical Review by Dorothy Mermin
1,423 words, approx. 5 pages
 In the following essay, Mermin discusses Hamilton's A Gift Imprisoned and three other recent biographies of Matthew Arnold. Mermin asserts that Hamilton's biography does not address the relevance of Arnold's poetry to modern intellectual and political issues.
from source:

Critical Essay by Peter Porter
1,414 words, approx. 5 pages
 In the following obituary, Porter asserts that Hamilton was both “the best judge of writing” in England and “the master stylist of our age.”
from source:

Critical Review by Richard Eder
1,314 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review of Robert Lowell, Eder praises Hamilton for his original research into primary sources and his fair, insightful portrayal of Lowell.
from source:

Critical Review by Robert Potts
1,301 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review, Potts describes Hamilton's Against Oblivion as light entertainment lacking in serious thought.
from source:

Critical Review by Michael Horovitz
1,285 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review, Horovitz offers a scathingly critical assessment of The Oxford Companion to Twentieth Century Poetry in English, edited by Hamilton. Horovitz asserts that Hamilton's editorial choices reflect a narrow range of literary taste. Horovitz further states that The Oxford Companion is superficial, careless, and full of factual errors.
from source:

Critical Review by Mick Imlah
1,283 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review of Against Oblivion, Imlah asserts that, while Hamilton's assessments of many of the poets included in this volume are bitingly critical, they are never unfair. Imlah further states that Hamilton's central concern in this book is with “the business of poetry,” the competitive squabbles among poets jostling for lasting status as literary greats.
from source:

Critical Review by Paul Binding
1,246 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following essay, Binding discusses Hamilton’s Keepers of the Flame, and Stephen Spender, by Hugh David. Binding asserts that Keepers of the Flame is an extremely interesting and informative read, but that it lacks a strong line of developed argument.
from source:

Critical Review by John Mortimer
1,242 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review of Writers in Hollywood, Mortimer praises Hamilton's research and expertise.
from source:

Critical Review by Anthony Thwaite
1,155 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review of Robert Lowell, Thwaite describes the biography as “a considerable achievement,” asserting that it is “one of the best literary biographies of a modern writer I have ever read.”
from source:

Critical Essay by William H. Pritchard
1,137 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following essay, Pritchard asserts that Hamilton distinguished himself most significantly as an essayist, poetry reviewer, and editor of literary journals.
from source:

Critical Review by William Pratt
1,134 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review, Pratt discusses Hamilton's Robert Lowell: A Biography, and Robert Lowell: Nihilist as Hero, by Vereen M. Bell. Pratt asserts that Hamilton's biography is “the fullest presentation of Lowell's life so far.”
from source:

Critical Review by Sean French
1,071 words, approx. 4 pages
 In the following review, French asserts that Hamilton's Writers in Hollywood is fascinating and enjoyable to read, and provides a valuable survey of the history of Hollywood screenwriting.
from source:

Critical Review by John Lucas
1,028 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review, Lucas praises Hamilton's Robert Lowell as an impressive biography.
from source:

Critical Essay by Hugo Williams
1,001 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following essay, Williams defends Hamilton against recent critics of his decades-long prominence in the world of literary criticism.
from source:

Critical Review by William Scammell
992 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review, Scammell offers a mixed review of Hamilton's A Gift Imprisoned. Scammell comments that Hamilton succeeds in “bringing Arnold vividly to life,” but comments that the book is not an entirely thorough examination of the poet's life and work.
from source:

from source:

Critical Review by Douglas Dunn
979 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review of A Poetry Chronicle, Dunn asserts that Hamilton is a valuable critic, and praises his essays as admirably written.
from source:

Critical Review by J. L. Carr
958 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review, Carr offers a mixed assessment of The Faber Book of Soccer, edited by Hamilton.
from source:

Critical Review by Albert E. Kalson
904 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review, Kalson offers a scathing assessment of Hamilton's Writers in Hollywood, asserting that it fails to provide new information, insight, or analysis.
from source:

Critical Review by Patrick McGilligan
859 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following essay, McGilligan discusses Hamilton’s Writers in Hollywood, and Ben Hecht, by William MacAdams. McGilligan offers a scathing review of Writers in Hollywood, asserting that Hamilton simply rehashes other books about Hollywood screenwriters while adding little new information or insight.
from source:

Critical Review by Michael Fried
845 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review, Fried calls The Visit “a magnificent book” and praises the lyrical qualities of Hamilton's poems.
from source:

Critical Review by Rupert Christiansen
836 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review, Christiansen asserts that Hamilton's Keepers of the Flame is entertaining and enjoyable to read, but that it does not resolve or add to ongoing critical debates about literary biography.
from source:

Critical Review by James Fenton
788 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review of A Poetry Chronicle, Fenton asserts that, while Hamilton's criticism may be severe, it offers a fresh perspective on the received literary masters.
from source:

Critical Review by Frederic Hunter
785 words, approx. 3 pages
 In the following review of Writers in Hollywood, Hunter praises Hamilton's scholarship and historical research.
from source:

Critical Review by D. J. Taylor
734 words, approx. 2 pages
 In the following review, Taylor praises Hamilton's scholarship in A Gift Imprisoned. Taylor observes that Hamilton's biography of Matthew Arnold provides insight into the cultural context in which the poet lived and worked.
from source:

Critical Review by Tom Dardis
719 words, approx. 2 pages
 In the following review, Dardis offers a scathing critique of Hamilton's Writers in Hollywood. Dardis describes the work as unoriginal, offering no new information or ideas, and containing many factual errors.
from source:

Critical Review by James L. W. West III
642 words, approx. 2 pages
 In the following review of Keepers of the Flame, West comments that Hamilton's approach is readable and balanced, but observes that the book as a whole lacks a clearly articulated theme.
from source:

from source:

Critical Review by Martin Fletcher
627 words, approx. 2 pages
 In the following review of The Faber Book of Soccer, edited by Hamilton, Fletcher praises the collection as classy and full of heart.
from source:

Critical Review by Michael Hofmann
537 words, approx. 2 pages
 In the following review of Fifty Poems, Hofmann asserts that, although Hamilton's poetry shows little variation or development through the years, some of his poems are brilliant and express “unwavering intensity.”
from source:

Critical Review by Victor Howes
474 words, approx. 2 pages
 In the following review, Howes offers a mixed assessment of Hamilton's Robert Lowell, describing the biography as “both compelling and repelling.”
from source:


 View More Articles on Ian Hamilton (critic)
|