In the following essay, Jackson provides a thematic and stylistic analysis of Every Man in His Humour, contending that “all Jonson's characteristic concerns, values, turns of mind and phrase, dramatic techniques, structural designs—all are here ready to be selected, developed, recombined.”

In the following essay, Seymour-Smith considers the central themes and chronicles the history of Every Man in His Humour.

In the following excerpt, Summers and Pebworth offer a thematic and stylistic overview of Every Man in His Humour and assert that the play is not one of Jonson's more successful comedies.

In the essay below, Donaldson offers an autobiographical reading of Every Man in His Humour.

In this essay, Lever offers an overview of the changes Jonson made to the original Quarto version of Every Man in His Humour.

In the essay that follows, Levin explores the function of the character of Doctor Clement in Every Man in His Humour and contends that the magistrate is a prototype for characters in Jonson's later plays.

In the essay below, Cohen contends that “the most striking difference” between the Quarto and Folio versions of Every Man in His Humour is the setting.

In this essay, Riddell investigates the printing history of the 1616 Folio revision of Every Man in His Humour, focusing on the reasons for the extensive cuts made to that version of the play.

In the following essay, Dutton contends that the 1616 revision of Every Man in His Humour provides a valuable opportunity to study Jonson's maturation as a dramatist.

In the essay below, Gottwald underscores the satirical content in the 1616 Folio version of Every Man in His Humour.