In the following essay, Carawan presents an analysis comparing the methods of argument used in the Tetralogies attributed to Antiphon with court arguments he is actually known to have made.

In the following essay, Schmitz analyzes the rhetorical strategies Antiphon and other orators used to convince judges of the accuracy of their arguments in representing reality.

In the following essay, Plant addresses the influence of Antiphon and Gorgias on the rhetorical techniques used by Thucydides.

In the following essay, Pendrick argues that Antiphon the Sophist and Antiphon the politician and logographer were two different individuals.

In the following essay, Sealey argues that Antiphon's Tetralogies do not provide conclusive evidence about the nature of Athenian legal practice.

In the following essay, Gagarin argues that, according to ancient tradition, Antiphon the Sophist and Antiphon of Rhamnus were one and the same person.

In the following essay, Gagarin examines Antiphon's use of evidentiary and argumentative proofs in the trial of law cases.

In the following essay, Dunn argues that the attribution of a fragment defining the nature of time to Antiphon the Sophist is valid.

In the following essay, Lattimore focuses on several mysteries arising in Antiphon's fifth oration, regarding a thorny murder case.