In the following essay, Cobb presents a detailed survey of Whitehead's speculative philosophy.

In the following essay, Holsapple regards the correlation between Whitehead's ideas in Science and the Modern World and William Carlos Williams's in The Embodiment of Knowledge.

In the following essay, Griffin explores parallels between Whitehead's thought and the doctrines of Buddhism.

In the following essay, Keller analyzes several fundamental areas of disagreement between proponents of classical and process metaphysics—the latter group represented by Whitehead. Considering the opposing natures of primary substance, causation, and value held by these two camps, Keller examines consequent differences in their conceptions of God.

In the following essay, Hartshorne traces affinities in the ethical thought and philosophies of religion of Whitehead and Nicolas Berdyaev.

In the following essay, Hintz studies Whitehead's philosophy of religion.

In the following essay, Treash compares Whitehead's philosophy of organism to the modern, Kantian conception of nature.

In the following essay, Doud investigates correspondences between Rainer Maria Rilke's poetry and Whitehead's metaphysics.

In the following essay, Lowe surveys Whitehead's systematic philosophy, assessing it favorably.

In the following essay, Dewey explicates the fundamental structure of Whitehead's philosophy of experience.

In the following essay, Sherburne discusses Whitehead's notions of metaphysical perishing and relatedness as they compare with Jean-Paul Sartre's idea of “nothingness.”

In the following essay, Brown examines Whitehead's views on “poetry's connection with theology and metaphysics.”

In the following essay, Hartshorne compares the thought of Bertrand Russell and Whitehead, judging Whitehead the greater philosopher.

In the following essay, Johnson considers Robert Duncan's poetry in relation to Whitehead's process philosophy.

In the following essay, Mizejewski explores the Whiteheadian consciousness of Gertrude Stein's Tender Buttons.

In the following essay, Ford studies Whitehead's concept of experience “as a unification of many past actualities.”

In the following essay, Campbell considers similarities in the views of Whitehead and Ralph Waldo Emerson concerning “man's relation to Nature and God.”

In the following essay, originally published in 1927, Wilson evaluates Whitehead's philosophy, calling Whitehead “perhaps one of the greatest creative minds of our day.”

In the following essay, Madden and Hare point out internal contradictions in Whitehead's conception of God.

In the following essay, Press characterizes Whitehead's metaphysics as based upon a moral philosophy of aestheticism.

In the following essay, Hartshorne focuses on the differences between Whitehead's theories and Buddhist belief, particularly in relation to Whitehead's views on causal asymmetry.

In the following essay, Wendler discusses Whitehead's significant contribution to the shift in contemporary thought from an emphasis on substance to a focus on process.

In the following essay, originally published in 1937, Dewey examines the basic method of Whitehead's philosophy.

In the following essay, Cappon discusses the relationship between Whitehead and William Wordsworth as inheritors of the ancient Greek philosophy of flux originated by Heraclitus.