William Morris | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of William Morris.
Related Topics

William Morris | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of William Morris.
This section contains 3,543 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Virginia S. Hale and Catherine Barnes Stevenson

SOURCE: Hale, Virginia S., and Catherine Barnes Stevenson. “Morris' Medieval Queen: A Paradox Resolved.” Victorian Poetry 30, no. 2 (summer 1992): 171-78.

In the following essay, Hale and Stevenson determine Queen Guenevere's guilt in “Defence of Guenevere,” contending that “Morris created a fully sexual woman who makes no apology for her adulterous love but rather celebrates herself and her status as loyal queen.”

William Morris' “Defence of Guenevere” has perplexed a number of scholars because of a seeming dichotomy between the Queen's apparent denial of the accusation of adultery—“you, O Sir Gauwaine, lie” (l. 46)—and her vivid evocation of her adulterous love for Launcelot (to which she devotes a full eighty lines of the poem).1 Focusing on this perceived contradiction, some critics characterize Guenevere as inconsistent and her defense as paradoxical. Carole Silver, for example, argues that “the poem's title is ironic. Guenevere intends a speech of self-vindication, but her...

(read more)

This section contains 3,543 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Virginia S. Hale and Catherine Barnes Stevenson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Virginia S. Hale and Catherine Barnes Stevenson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.