Neuromancer | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of Neuromancer.

Neuromancer | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of Neuromancer.
This section contains 3,036 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Rob Latham

SOURCE: Latham, Rob. “Cyberpunk = Gibson = Neuromancer.” Science-Fiction Studies 20, no. 2 (July 1993): 266-72.

In the following review of Fiction 2000: Cyberpunk and the Future of Narrative, edited by George Slusser and Tom Shippy, Latham asserts that Neuromancer is the predominant subject of the essays in this collection.

In the informal interview that closes Fiction 2000 (a collection of essays from “an international symposium on the nature of fiction at the end of the twentieth century … held in Leeds, England … between June 28 and July 1, 1989 … [and focusing] specifically on the form of science fiction called cyberpunk”[279]), Istvan Csicsery-Ronay, responding to a remark that the conference had featured “an emphasis on [William] Gibson's Neuromancer,” replies: “I think the impression that much of the conference centered on Neuromancer may actually just be an effect of the convergence in time of the talks. I don't perceive this as having been a ‘Neuromancer conference’ at all” (280-81). Csicsery-Ronay...

(read more)

This section contains 3,036 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Rob Latham
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Rob Latham from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.