Hocus Pocus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Hocus Pocus.

Hocus Pocus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Hocus Pocus.
This section contains 3,462 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Leonard

SOURCE: "Black Magic," in Nation, Vol. 251, No. 12, October 15, 1990, pp. 421-25.

In the review below, Leonard praises Hocus Pocus and discusses Vonnegut's fatalistic message.

Hocus Pocus seems to me to be Vonnegut's best novel in years—funny and prophetic, yes, and fabulous too, as cunning as Aesop and as gloomy as Grimm; but also rich and referential; a meditation on American history and American literature; an elegy; a keening. "How is this for a definition of high art," we are asked by the antihero, Eugene Debs Hartke: "'Making the most of the raw materials of futility?'"

But Hocus Pocus has been not so much reviewed as consumer-tested, like a bar of chocolate, as if all Vonneguts were Hershey's, needing only to be categorized as Semi-Sweet, Special Dark or Bitter Almond. Without even bothering to cut a new stencil, critics perceive him as an amusing atavism of the 1960s...

(read more)

This section contains 3,462 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Leonard
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by John Leonard from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.