Salem witch trials | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Salem witch trials.

Salem witch trials | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Salem witch trials.
This section contains 10,328 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the George Lyman Kittredge

SOURCE: "Witchcraft and the Puritans," in Witchcraft in Old and New England, 1929. Reprint by Russell & Russell, 1958, pp. 329–74.

In the following excerpt, Kittredge asserts that belief in witchcraft was common throughout history and points out that the witchcraft trials in the American colonies were remarkably limited in number.

… It is frequently stated, and still oftener assumed, that the outbreak at Salem was peculiar in its virulence, or, at all events, in its intensity. This is a serious error, due, like other misapprehensions, to a neglect of the history of witchcraft as a whole. The fact is, the Salem excitement was the opposite of peculiar,—it was perfectly typical. The European belief in witchcraft, which our forefathers shared without exaggerating it, was a constant quantity. It was always present, and continuously fraught with direful possibilities. But it did not find expression in a steady and regular succession of witch-trials. On...

(read more)

This section contains 10,328 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the George Lyman Kittredge
Copyrights
Gale
George Lyman Kittredge from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.