Hunter S. Thompson | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Hunter S. Thompson.

Hunter S. Thompson | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Hunter S. Thompson.
This section contains 684 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William F. Buckley, Jr.

The "60's," which ran from 1965 to 1974, brought forth a fresh, raw journalism appropriate to the general abandon…. Hunter Thompson is indisputably a hugely important sociological phenomenon. The age's distinctive feature was iconoclasm—anyone in a position of authority was presumptively engaged in nefarious enterprise…. So it was iconoclasm and a personal hedonism expressed in sex, drugs—and rhetoric. (p. 1)

[What] emerges with a most awful vividness from ["The Great Shark Hunt"], presented as a chrestomathy by the most highly accredited bard of the period, is a very nearly unrelieved distemper, and this, along with the tintinnabulary drugs, is so markedly the Sign of Thompson that to fail to give it due emphasis would be to fail to remark Jimmy Durante's nose.

Alas, it is lacking in flavor. Or at least such is the impression of any reader familiar, say, with the vituperative art of Westbrook Pegler, or John...

(read more)

This section contains 684 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William F. Buckley, Jr.
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by William F. Buckley, Jr. from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.