The Taming of the Shrew | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 51 pages of analysis & critique of The Taming of the Shrew.

The Taming of the Shrew | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 51 pages of analysis & critique of The Taming of the Shrew.
This section contains 13,656 words
(approx. 46 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carol Rutter

SOURCE: “Kate, Bianca, Ruth, and Sarah: Playing the Woman's Part in The Taming of the Shrew,” in Shakespeare's Sweet Thunder: Essays on the Early Comedies, edited by Michael J. Collins, University of Delaware Press, 1997, pp. 176-215.

In the following excerpt, Rutter provides an overview of twentieth-century performances of The Taming of the Shrew, discussing the effects of feminist theory on the interpretations.

Mess. Your honor's players, hearing your amendment, Are come to play a pleasant comedy. … Sly. Is not a comonty a Christmas gambold, or a tumbling-trick? Page. No, my good lord, it is more pleasing stuff. Sly. What, household stuff? Page. It is a kind of history. 

(Ind. 2.129-30 and 137-41)

Like Polonius trying to pin down the play at Elsinore, The Taming of the Shrew makes several stabs at fixing its own genre. But while the self-appointed master of the Danish revels has a clear political...

(read more)

This section contains 13,656 words
(approx. 46 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carol Rutter
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Carol Rutter from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.