The Phoenix and the Turtle | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of The Phoenix and the Turtle.

The Phoenix and the Turtle | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of The Phoenix and the Turtle.
This section contains 3,193 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Murray Copland

SOURCE: 'The Dead Phoenix," Essays in Criticism, Vol. XV, No. 3, July, 1965, pp. 279-87.

In the essay that follows, Copland criticizes a mystical interpretive approach to the poem, given the "fashionable" status of metaphysical images in the Elizabethan age.

The Phoenix was a striking bird on three counts: (a) its beauty, (b) its uniqueness, and (c) its self-resurrecting habit.

In Shakespeare's poem The Phoenix and Turtle the attribute (a) is prominently present:

Truth and Beautie buried be.

Here Truth = the Turtle, and Beautie = the Phoenix.

As for (b), Robert Chester, whose Love's Martyr prescribed the bare postulates for the poem, had introduced a personal variation of a certain imaginative power. The usual Phoenix is complete in itself; Chester's requires a mate, and finds that mate in a true Turtle. This is not necessarily a muddling idea. If the Phoenix is seen as a poetic hyperbole for the summit of...

(read more)

This section contains 3,193 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Murray Copland
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Murray Copland from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.