An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews.

An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews.
This section contains 3,164 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Ian Watt

SOURCE: “Shamela,” in Fielding: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Ronald Paulson, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1962, pp. 45-51.

In the following essay, which first appeared in slightly different form in 1956, Watts claims that Henry Fielding's intention in Shamela, a satire on Samuel Richardson's Pamela, is to attack religious ideas of virtue and to undermine Richardson's interpretation of his heroine's character. Watts argues further that this latter purpose gives the novel its basic narrative form, as it begins and ends with letters exchanged between two parsons about Richardson's novel.

Pamela: or, Virtue Rewarded was published on November 6th, 1740. It immediately became the sensation of the literary season, and a swarm of attacks, parodies, and spurious continuations soon appeared to sour Richardson's remarkable and unexpected triumph; of these the first and easily the best was the eighteen-penny pamphlet An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews, published on April 4th...

(read more)

This section contains 3,164 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Ian Watt
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Ian Watt from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.