Forgot your password?  
Related Topics

Critical Essay | Critical Essay by Irvin Matus

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Critical Essay by Irvin Matus.
This section contains 2,355 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Purchase our Critical Essay by Irvin Matus - Critical Essay by Irvin Matus

Critical Essay by Irvin Matus

SOURCE: "Looking for Shakespeare: Two Partisans Explain and Debate the Authorship Question," in The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 268, No. 4, October, 1991, pp. 43-61.

In his reply to Bethell 's essay (above), Matus disputes the Oxfordian chronology asserted by Bethell and defends the "country bumpkin " from Stratford as the author of the works attributed to Shakespeare.

Tom Bethell's case for Oxford demonstrates once again that in the thousands of works on Shakespeare and his plays, something can be found to support any notion. It also demonstrates that, as usual, Oxfordians must often resort to outdated scholarship to find support for their notions. Apparently, modern scholarship is as discouraging to them as the contemporaneous records of Shakespeare and his theater are treacherous.

These problems are on display in Bethell's assertion that there is "abundant evidence&#x...

(read more)

This section contains 2,355 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Purchase our Critical Essay by Irvin Matus - Critical Essay by Irvin Matus
Follow Us on Facebook