Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.

Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.
This section contains 3,456 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Maynard Smith

SOURCE: Smith, John Maynard. “Taking a Chance on Evolution.” New York Review of Books 39, no. 9 (14 May 1992): 34-6.

In the following review of Wonderful Life and Bully for Brontosaurus, Smith discusses Gould's concept of contingency and his views about whether or not science is necessarily progressive.

Although very different in style and content, the last two books by Stephen Jay Gould—Wonderful Life and Bully for Brontosaurus—and Ernst Mayr's Toward a New Philosophy of Biology are ultimately about the same questions. Is evolutionary biology a science? If so, what kind of a science is it? Mayr's book is a collection of essays, published over the past thirty years, and addressed both to biologists and philosophers. His aim is to clarify the concepts that underlie evolutionary biology. His central theme is that these concepts make evolutionary biology an autonomous science, and not merely a subbranch of physics. This claim...

(read more)

This section contains 3,456 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Maynard Smith
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by John Maynard Smith from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.