[North by Northwest] is arguably as good an indication as can be found of Alfred Hitchcock's ability to match his sense of humour to his lively suspense tactics. Strictly speaking, according to those who claim to know such things, the title is a compass point that doesn't exist. It is our cue to disregard any measure of 'reality' in the film. 'Realism' is there, of course; but not, overtly at any rate, 'reality'. Further nudges towards levity are given by the leading character, Roger O Thornhill …, who emphasises that his initials spell 'rot', and that his central 'O' stands for nothing. There is, however, a nuance to that 'nothing': the plot is one of mistaken identity, Thornhill being considered by the villains to be a spy who is actually as non-existent as the compass point to which symbolically he eventually travels; and therefore when this false identity is thrust upon him, Thornhill is nothing indeed.
All of which goes to suggest that Hitchcock's intention was purely to divert us by letting his fancy take idiosyncratic flight. Nevertheless we must not overlook the significance of the relationship between the film's tricky title and Prince Hamlet's famous account of his own mental condition. Happily, most of us can distinguish hawks from handsaws. Likewise, although we seldom stop smiling while Hitchcock's jeu d'esprit progresses, we can acknowledge a political comment of sorts in the fact that government intelligence agencies, such as the one depicted and satirised in the film, have their real counterparts which are thought in certain cases to be ruthless in their methods.
This is a free excerpt of 262 words. There are 451 words (approx.
2 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our (Sir) Hitchcock, Alfred 1899–1980: Critical Essay by Gordon Gow Access Pass.
